Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations

被引:17
|
作者
Liu, BH
Knapp, SJ
Birkes, D
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT CROP & SOIL SCI,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
[2] OREGON STATE UNIV,DEPT STAT,CORVALLIS,OR 97331
关键词
bootstrap; jackknife; heritability; selection indices;
D O I
10.1007/s001220050375
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Genetic correlations (rho(g)) are frequently estimated from natural and experimental populations, yet many of the statistical properties of estimators of rho(g) are not known, and accurate methods have not been described for estimating the precision of estimates of rho(g). Our objective was to assess the statistical properties of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), restricted maximum likelihood (REML), and maximum likelihood (ML) estimators of rho(g) by simulating bivariate normal samples for the one-way balanced linear model. We estimated probabilities of non-positive definite MANOVA estimates of genetic variance-covariance matrices and biases and variances of MANOVA, REML, and ML estimators of rho(g), and assessed the accuracy of parametric, jackknife, and bootstrap variance and confidence interval estimators for rho(g). MANOVA estimates of rho(g) were normally distributed. REML and ML estimates were normally distributed for rho(g) = 0.1, but skewed for rho(g) = 0.5 and 0.9. All of the estimators were biased. The MANOVA estimator was less biased than REML and ML estimators when heritability (H), the number of genotypes (n), and the number of replications (r) were low. The biases were otherwise nearly equal for different estimators and could not be reduced by jackknifing or bootstrapping. The variance of the MANOVA estimator was greater than the variance of the REML or ML estimator for most H, n, and r. Bootstrapping produced estimates of the variance of rho(g) close to the known variance, especially for REML and ML. The observed coverages of the REML and ML bootstrap interval estimators were consistently close to stated coverages, whereas the observed coverage of the MANOVA bootstrap interval estimator was unsatisfactory for some H, rho(g), n, and r. The other interval estimators produced unsatisfactory coverages. REML and ML bootstrap interval estimates were narrower than MANOVA bootstrap interval estimates for most H, rho(g), n, and r.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 19
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Confidence intervals for ratios of AUCs in the case of serial sampling: a comparison of seven methods
    Jaki, Thomas
    Wolfsegger, Martin J.
    Ploner, Meinhard
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2009, 8 (01) : 12 - 24
  • [32] Male Bias in Distributions of Additive Genetic, Residual, and Phenotypic Variances of Shared Traits
    Wyman, Minyoung J.
    Rowe, Locke
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2014, 184 (03): : 326 - 337
  • [33] Confidence intervals of difference and ratio between two means of delta-Birnbaum-Saunders distributions
    Ratasukharom, Natchaya
    Niwitpong, Sa-Aat
    Niwitpong, Suparat
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2024,
  • [34] Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling design based on Horvitz–Thompson type estimators
    Mohammad Mohammadi
    Mohammad Salehi
    J. N. K. Rao
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2014, 21 : 351 - 371
  • [35] Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for All Pairwise Differences between Medians of Zero-Inflated Lognormal Distributions
    Janthasuwan, Usanee
    Niwitpong, Sa-Aat
    Niwitpong, Suparat
    LOBACHEVSKII JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2024, 45 (09) : 4148 - 4163
  • [36] Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling design based on Horvitz-Thompson type estimators
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    Salehi, Mohammad
    Rao, J. N. K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 21 (02) : 351 - 371
  • [37] Performance of confidence intervals for the population size in capture-recapture experiment under inverse sampling with replacement
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2017, 87 (05) : 984 - 992
  • [38] Fisher transformation based confidence intervals of correlations in fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis
    Welz, Thilo
    Doebler, Philipp
    Pauly, Markus
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 75 (01): : 1 - 22
  • [39] Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods
    Kennet-Cohen, Tamar
    Kleper, Dvir
    Turvall, Elliot
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (01): : 39 - 59
  • [40] Evaluation of genetic variances, heritabilities, and correlations for yield and fiber traits among cotton F-2 hybrid populations
    Tang, B
    Jenkins, JN
    Watson, CE
    McCarty, JC
    Creech, RG
    EUPHYTICA, 1996, 91 (03) : 315 - 322