The revision of competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors in Australia: A mixed methods approach

被引:7
作者
Fields, Sally M. [1 ,2 ]
Unsworth, Carolyn A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Harreveld, Bobby [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[2] Bond Univ, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Federat Univ, Gippsland, Vic, Australia
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Jonkoping, Sweden
[5] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
关键词
automobile driving; competency standards; Delphi technique; focus group; occupational therapy; professional competence; standard of care; CONSENSUS; DELPHI;
D O I
10.1111/1440-1630.12722
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction Competency standards outline the knowledge, skills, and attributes that are required for competent practice. This study describes the process followed to revise and validate the competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors in order to guide clinical practice in this area of advanced occupational therapy practice. Methods A mixed methods research approach was used in this study. In phase 1, three focus groups with driver assessors reviewed and suggested revisions to the competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors. Phase 2 involved content validation with key stakeholders through a focus group with consumers, written feedback from Australian state, and territory driver licensing authorities, and a two-round Delphi process with Australian occupational therapy driver assessors. Results Forty-nine occupational therapy driver assessors participated in the phase 1 focus groups. Deductive content analysis of the transcripts provided data to revise the competency standards. Inductive analysis provided an in-depth understanding of the participants' views and was interpreted through six categories and their underlying subcategories: purposes and benefits; jurisdictional variations and practice diversity; language use; defining competent practice; challenging systems and processes; and competency standards content. Forty-eight occupational therapy driver assessors participated in the Delphi process. In Round 1, only 1 of the 164 competency standards and practice behaviours rated did not achieve the pre-determined 70% consensus rate. In Round 2, all statements achieved consensus, with the overall average consensus level obtained across the Round 2 statements at 96.8%. Conclusion The revised Australian Competency Standards for Occupational Therapy Driver Assessors have been endorsed by Occupational Therapy Australia and released for clinical use. The methods described in this research provide a framework suitable for revision or development of competency standards in both other areas of occupational therapy practice and other health-care professions.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 271
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Knowledge, skills and professional behaviours needed for occupational therapists and physiotherapists new to work- related practice
    Adam, Kerry
    Gibson, Elizabeth
    Strong, Jenny
    Lyle, Alexandra
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2011, 38 (04): : 309 - 318
  • [2] Competence in nursing practice: A controversial concept - A focused review of literature
    Cowan, DT
    Norman, I
    Coopamah, VP
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2005, 25 (05) : 355 - 362
  • [3] Creswell J.W., 2011, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
  • [4] Di Stefano M., 2018, VicRoads guidelines for occupational therapy driver assessors, V3rd edn.
  • [5] Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
    Diamond, Ivan R.
    Grant, Robert C.
    Feldman, Brian M.
    Pencharz, Paul B.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Moore, Aideen M.
    Wales, Paul W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 401 - 409
  • [6] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [7] Revision of the Competency Standards for Occupational Therapy Driver Assessors: An overview of the evidence for the inclusion of cognitive and perceptual assessments within fitness-to-drive evaluations
    Fields, Sally M.
    Unsworth, Carolyn A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2017, 64 (04) : 328 - 339
  • [8] Fields SM., 2018, Australian competency standards for occupational therapy driver assessors
  • [9] Frank JR., 2015, CANMEDS 2015 PHYS CO
  • [10] Gonczi A., 1990, ESTABLISHING COMPETE