A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancer

被引:81
作者
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [1 ]
Pawitan, Yudi [1 ]
Leifland, Karin [2 ]
Darabi, Hatef [1 ]
Hall, Per [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Box 281, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] South Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] South Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-11883 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2017年 / 19卷
关键词
Risk prediction; Breast cancer; Mammographic density; Microcalcification; Masses; Computer-aided detection; Prevention; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-017-0820-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Most mammography screening programs are not individualized. To efficiently screen for breast cancer, the individual risk of the disease should be determined. We describe a model that could be used at most mammography screening units without adding substantial cost. Methods: The study was based on the Karma cohort, which included 70,877 participants. Mammograms were collected up to 3 years following the baseline mammogram. A prediction protocol was developed using mammographic density, computer-aided detection of microcalcifications and masses, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, age, and body mass index. Relative risks were calculated using conditional logistic regression. Absolute risks were calculated using the iCARE protocol. Results: Comparing women at highest and lowest mammographic density yielded a fivefold higher risk of breast cancer for women at highest density. When adding microcalcifications and masses to the model, high-risk women had a nearly ninefold higher risk of breast cancer than those at lowest risk. In the full model, taking HRT use, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status into consideration, the AUC reached 0.71. Conclusions: Measures of mammographic features and information on HRT use, family history of breast cancer, and menopausal status enabled early identification of women within the mammography screening program at such a high risk of breast cancer that additional examinations are warranted. In contrast, women at low risk could probably be screened less intensively.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions [J].
Antoniou, A. C. ;
Cunningham, A. P. ;
Peto, J. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Lalloo, F. ;
Narod, S. A. ;
Risch, H. A. ;
Eyfjord, J. E. ;
Hopper, J. L. ;
Southey, M. C. ;
Olsson, H. ;
Johannsson, O. ;
Borg, A. ;
Passini, B. ;
Radice, P. ;
Manoukian, S. ;
Eccles, D. M. ;
Tang, N. ;
Olah, E. ;
Anton-Culver, H. ;
Warner, E. ;
Lubinski, J. ;
Gronwald, J. ;
Gorski, B. ;
Tryggvadottir, L. ;
Syrjakoski, K. ;
Kallioniemi, O-P ;
Eerola, H. ;
Nevanlinna, H. ;
Pharoah, P. D. P. ;
Easton, D. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (08) :1457-1466
[3]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[4]   Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement [J].
Darabi, Hatef ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Zhao, Wanting ;
Liu, Jianjun ;
Hall, Per ;
Humphreys, Keith .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (01)
[5]   Mammography screening in the Netherlands: delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening [J].
Duijm, LEM ;
Groenewoud, JH ;
Jansen, FH ;
Fracheboud, J ;
van Beek, M ;
de Koning, HJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (10) :1795-1799
[6]   NORDCAN - a Nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research [J].
Engholm, Gerda ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Christensen, Niels ;
Bray, Freddie ;
Gjerstorff, Marianne L. ;
Klint, Asa ;
Kotlum, Joanis E. ;
Olafsdottir, Elinborg ;
Pukkala, Eero ;
Storm, Hans H. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2010, 49 (05) :725-736
[7]   REGRESSIONS BY LEAPS AND BOUNDS [J].
FURNIVAL, GM ;
WILSON, RW .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1974, 16 (04) :499-511
[8]   Cohort Profile: The Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) [J].
Gabrielson, Marike ;
Eriksson, Mikael ;
Hammarstrom, Mattias ;
Borgquist, Signe ;
Leifland, Karin ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Hall, Per .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 46 (06) :1740-+
[9]   PROJECTING INDIVIDUALIZED PROBABILITIES OF DEVELOPING BREAST-CANCER FOR WHITE FEMALES WHO ARE BEING EXAMINED ANNUALLY [J].
GAIL, MH ;
BRINTON, LA ;
BYAR, DP ;
CORLE, DK ;
GREEN, SB ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
MULVIHILL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (24) :1879-1886
[10]   Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them [J].
Lee, Han Na ;
Sohn, Yu-Mee ;
Han, Kyung Hwa .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (09) :1061-1068