The influences of government spending on energy poverty: Evidence from developing countries

被引:105
作者
Nguyen, Canh Phuc [1 ]
Su, Thanh Dinh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Publ Finance, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu,Dist 3, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
关键词
Public policy; Government spending; Energy poverty; Clean fuels and technologies; Electricity; Developing countries; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FUEL POVERTY; LEAST-SQUARES; SIZE; POLICY; REGRESSIONS; UNCERTAINTY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121785
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature has documented different determinants of energy poverty, i.e., income poverty, energy price, technology, and financial development. Meanwhile, government policies through public spending might play a critical role in alleviating energy poverty, but little attention has been paid to this factor. This study endeavours to investigate the effects of government spending on energy poverty in a global sample of 56 developing countries. Specifically, the study firstly examines the influence of government spending on four proxies of energy poverty. Secondly, we examine the role of institutional quality as the rule of the game in society, in the effects of government spending. Lastly, we investigate the channels of the effects of government spending on energy poverty. Applying several panel estimates, the significance of the results is threefold. First, government spending has a U-shaped effect on energy poverty, implying that increases in government spending may alleviate energy poverty until a certain level; however, from this tipping point, any excessive spending would be harmful to energy prosperity. Second, institutional quality serves as a critical catalyst in shaping the effects of government spending. Third, the effects of government spending are found to be transmitted through two channels: economic growth and income inequality. 0 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[51]   Rural electrification and energy poverty: Empirical evidences from Brazil [J].
Pereira, Marcio Giannini ;
Vasconcelos Freitas, Marcos Aurelio ;
da Silva, Neilton Fidelis .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (04) :1229-1240
[52]  
Phuc Canh Nguyen, 2018, J ASIA BUS EC STUD, V25
[53]  
Phuc Canh Nguyen, 2019, INT EC
[54]   Measuring energy efficiency: Is energy intensity a good evidence base? [J].
Proskuryakova, L. ;
Kovalev, A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 138 :450-459
[55]  
Richard Hemming, 2002, WP02208 IMF
[56]   How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata [J].
Roodman, David .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) :86-136
[57]   Electricity access and income inequality in South Africa: Evidence from Bayesian and NARDL analyses [J].
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu ;
Adams, Samuel .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 29
[58]  
Sebastian Kripfganz, 2017, GERM STAT US GROUP M
[59]   Fuel poverty, affordability, and energy justice in England: Policy insights from the Warm Front Program [J].
Sovacool, Benjamin K. .
ENERGY, 2015, 93 :361-371
[60]   What moves and works: Broadening the consideration of energy poverty [J].
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
Cooper, Christopher ;
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Johnson, Katie ;
Zoppo, David ;
Clarke, Shannon ;
Eidsness, Jay ;
Crafton, Meredith ;
Velumail, Thiyagarajan ;
Raza, Hilal A. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :715-719