The influences of government spending on energy poverty: Evidence from developing countries

被引:105
作者
Nguyen, Canh Phuc [1 ]
Su, Thanh Dinh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Publ Finance, 59C Nguyen Dinh Chieu,Dist 3, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
关键词
Public policy; Government spending; Energy poverty; Clean fuels and technologies; Electricity; Developing countries; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; FUEL POVERTY; LEAST-SQUARES; SIZE; POLICY; REGRESSIONS; UNCERTAINTY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.121785
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The literature has documented different determinants of energy poverty, i.e., income poverty, energy price, technology, and financial development. Meanwhile, government policies through public spending might play a critical role in alleviating energy poverty, but little attention has been paid to this factor. This study endeavours to investigate the effects of government spending on energy poverty in a global sample of 56 developing countries. Specifically, the study firstly examines the influence of government spending on four proxies of energy poverty. Secondly, we examine the role of institutional quality as the rule of the game in society, in the effects of government spending. Lastly, we investigate the channels of the effects of government spending on energy poverty. Applying several panel estimates, the significance of the results is threefold. First, government spending has a U-shaped effect on energy poverty, implying that increases in government spending may alleviate energy poverty until a certain level; however, from this tipping point, any excessive spending would be harmful to energy prosperity. Second, institutional quality serves as a critical catalyst in shaping the effects of government spending. Third, the effects of government spending are found to be transmitted through two channels: economic growth and income inequality. 0 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Optimum government size and economic growth in case of Indian states: Evidence from panel threshold model [J].
Akram, Vaseem ;
Rath, Badri Narayan .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 88 :151-162
[2]   The Relationship between Optimal Size of Government and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria [J].
Altunc, O. Faruk ;
Aydin, Celil .
LOGOS UNIVERSALITY MENTALITY EDUCATION NOVELTY (LUMEN 2013), 2013, 92 :66-75
[3]   2-STAGE LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS IN MODELS WITH VARIABLE TREATMENT INTENSITY [J].
ANGRIST, JD ;
IMBENS, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :431-442
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1962, IMF Economic Review
[5]   Fiscal Policy Is Still an Effective Instrument of Macroeconomic Policy [J].
Arestis, Philip .
PANOECONOMICUS, 2011, 58 (02) :143-156
[6]   Inequality of energy poverty between groups in Spain [J].
Aristondo, Oihana ;
Onaindia, Eneritz .
ENERGY, 2018, 153 :431-442
[7]   The impact of government size on economic growth: A threshold analysis [J].
Asimakopoulos, Stylianos ;
Karavias, Yiannis .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 139 :65-68
[8]   Crowding-out or crowding-in? Public and private investment in India [J].
Bahal, Girish ;
Raissi, Mehdi ;
Tulin, Volodymyr .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 109 :323-333
[9]  
Belsley D. A., 1988, Computer Science in Economics and Management, V1, P21, DOI 10.1007/BF00435200
[10]   CROWDING OUT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF FISCAL-POLICY [J].
BUITER, WH .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1977, 7 (03) :309-328