Improving Personnel Selection through Frame of Reference Effect on Personality Inventory: Predictive and Incremental Validity over Cognitive Ability and Job Knowledge

被引:2
|
作者
Ovidiu, Stroescu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, 90 Panduri St, Bucharest 050663, Romania
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PSIWORLD 2014 - 5TH EDITION | 2015年 / 187卷
关键词
frame of reference; contextualization; personality inventory; job performance; OF-REFERENCE; SCALE SCORES; CRITERION; PERFORMANCE; TESTS; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.049
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Improving predictive validity of personality inventory in the context of personnel selection is an actual concern among researchers. We tested the effect of frame of reference (FOR) on the predictive validity of a Big Five measure in the context of personnel selection, where other two predictors were contained. The sample size was realistic for a small business enterprise (N = 36). Agreeability was the only dimension showing predictive validity (FOR effect). Results suggested also that narrow dimensions were more useful predictors in the contextualized measure of personality adding incremental validity over cognitive ability and job knowledge. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 265
页数:5
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] The Incremental Validity of Honesty-Humility Over Cognitive Ability and the Big Five Personality Traits
    Oh, In-Sue
    Le, Huy
    Whitman, Daniel S.
    Kim, Kwanghyun
    Yoo, Tae-Yong
    Hwang, Jong-Oh
    Kim, Cheon-Seok
    HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2014, 27 (03) : 206 - 224
  • [2] Effects of Faking on the Predictive Validity of a Quasi-Ipsative Forced-Choice Personality Inventory: Implications for Sustainable Personnel Selection
    Martinez, Alexandra
    Moscoso, Silvia
    Lado, Mario
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [3] Effect of job applicant faking and cognitive ability on self-other agreement and criterion validity of personality assessments
    Wood, Joshua K.
    Anglim, Jeromy
    Horwood, Sharon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 30 (03) : 378 - 391