Humerospinous distance measurements: accuracy and usefulness for predicting shoulder dystocia in delivery at term

被引:5
作者
Klaij, FAV [1 ]
Geirsson, RT [1 ]
Nielsen, H [1 ]
Hreinsdottir, M [1 ]
Haraldsdottir, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Prenatal Diag Unit, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
shoulder dystocia; humerospinous distance; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12020115.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate if the humerospinous distance, as an indicator of shoulder width, could predict shoulder dystocia at term. Design Prospective cross-sectional study of a stratified reference group of healthy women and a test group of women with risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Measurements were not revealed. Outcome measures were difficulties with delivery of the shoulders and correlation with maternal body mass and birth weight. Subjects Seventy-two women with singleton pregnancies at a University Clinic: 32 women at 39-42 weeks for reference and 40 women in an at-risk test group (weight > 90 kg, weight gain > 20 kg, previous macrosomic baby, history of shoulder dystocial difficult delivery, clinical suspicion of a large baby). Women with a breech fetus, twins and those not able to deliver vaginally were excluded. Methods Fetal shoulders were measured from the convergence of the cervical spinous processes at the approximate cervicothoracic vertebral junction to the medial border of the humeral head. Correlations were made with maternal body mass, birth weight, birth weight estimation, ultrasound and postnatal humerospinous measurements. Results One case of shoulder dystocia in a fetus with an average humerospinous measurement occurred in the reference group and there were no cases in the test group. There was no predictive value of a large humerospinous measurement and no correlation with maternal or fetal size. Movement of the fetal arm could change the humerospinous distance considerably, which could account for the difference between a normal and large measurement. Conclusion The humerospinous distance cannot be used to predict shoulder dystocia.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 119
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] PERINATAL IMPLICATIONS OF SHOULDER DYSTOCIA
    BASKETT, TF
    ALLEN, AC
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (01) : 14 - 17
  • [2] BENEDETTI TJ, 1978, OBSTET GYNECOL, V52, P526
  • [3] Deter RL, 1993, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, P361
  • [4] PREDICTION OF FETAL GROWTH DEVIATION BY ULTRASONIC BIOMETRY .1. METHODOLOGY
    EIKNES, SH
    GROTTUM, P
    PERSSON, PH
    MARSAL, K
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1982, 61 (01) : 53 - 58
  • [5] SHOULDER DYSTOCIA - IS IT PREDICTABLE
    GEARY, M
    MCPARLAND, P
    JOHNSON, H
    STRONGE, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 62 (01): : 15 - 18
  • [6] Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study
    Gonen, O
    Rosen, DJD
    Dolfin, Z
    Tepper, R
    Markov, S
    Fejgin, MD
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06) : 913 - 917
  • [7] Is macrosomia predictable, and are shoulder dystocia and birth trauma preventable?
    Gonen, R
    Spiegel, D
    Abend, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) : 526 - 529
  • [8] AN ALTERNATE MANEUVER FOR MANAGEMENT OF SHOULDER DYSTOCIA
    GONIK, B
    STRINGER, CA
    HELD, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 145 (07) : 882 - 884
  • [9] FETAL SHOULDER MEASUREMENTS WITH MRI
    KASTLER, B
    GANGI, A
    MATHELIN, C
    GERMAIN, P
    ARHAN, JM
    TREISSER, A
    DIETEMANN, JL
    WACKENHEIM, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1993, 17 (05) : 777 - 780
  • [10] LEARY JA, 1990, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V162, P5