A critical re-appraisal of BRCA1 methylation studies in ovarian cancer

被引:26
作者
Senturk, Emir [1 ,5 ]
Cohen, Samantha [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dottino, Peter R. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Martignetti, John A. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Genet, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Reprod Sci, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Genom Sci, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
BRCA1; Methylation; Epithelial ovarian cancer; DNA METHYLATION; SPORADIC BREAST; PROMOTER REGION; MESSENGER-RNA; MUTATION CARRIERS; LUNG-CANCER; CPG ISLAND; GENE; CARCINOMA; HYPERMETHYLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.026
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A central challenge facing gynecologic oncology is achieving personalized care in ovarian cancer treatment. The current ovarian cancer classification scheme distinguishes tumors based on histopathologic subtype, grade, and surgical stage. Recent molecular investigations have highlighted distinguishing genetic features of certain tumors within a given category, and given the rapid pace of technologic advancement combined with plummeting costs for complete genomic sequencing this classification will markedly improve. Clinical studies have begun to explore the influence of currently known distinctions on the natural history of the disease, most recently with particular attention to the BRCA1 status of tumors. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene have long been known to increase a woman's risk of developing ovarian cancer. As has been shown, BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers may be associated with characteristic differences in therapeutic response and overall survival, and further defining these subsets may become instrumental in clinical decision-making. Therefore, given the eightfold difference (5-40%) in reported frequency of BRCA1 inactivation by methylation in the pioneering studies in the field, a critical re-appraisal of the literature, techniques, samples used, and interpretations of BRCA1 inactivation is warranted along with a review of the more recent and comprehensive molecular studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[2]  
Atallah Ehab, 2007, Clin Adv Hematol Oncol, V5, P544
[3]   GA-binding protein α/β is a critical regulator of the BRCA1 promoter [J].
Atlas, E ;
Stramwasser, M ;
Whiskin, K ;
Mueller, CR .
ONCOGENE, 2000, 19 (15) :1933-1940
[4]   A CREB site in the BRCA1 proximal promoter acts as a constitutive transcriptional element [J].
Atlas, E ;
Stramwasser, M ;
Mueller, CR .
ONCOGENE, 2001, 20 (48) :7110-7114
[5]   Specific binding of the methyl binding domain protein 2 at the BRCA1-NBR2 locus [J].
Auriol, E ;
Billard, LM ;
Magdinier, F ;
Dante, R .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (13) :4243-4254
[6]  
Baldwin RL, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P5329
[7]  
Baldwin RL, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P1413
[8]  
Berek J.S., 2004, Practical gynecologic oncology, V4th
[9]   Tumour-specific distribution of BRCA1 promoter region methylation supports a pathogenetic role in breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Bianco, T ;
Chenevix-Trench, G ;
Walsh, DCA ;
Cooper, JE ;
Dobrovic, A .
CARCINOGENESIS, 2000, 21 (02) :147-151
[10]  
BILLAM M, 2009, BREAST CANC RES TREA