On improving GARCH volatility forecasts for Bitcoin via a meta-learning approach

被引:22
作者
Aras, Serkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Econometr Dept, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Volatility; Bitcoin; Model Confidence Set; Combining forecasts; GARCH; REALIZED VOLATILITY; ANYTHING BEAT; CRYPTOCURRENCIES; MODELS; RETURN; DOLLAR; PRICE; GOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107393
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Modelling the volatility of Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency with the largest market share, has recently attracted considerable attention from researchers, practitioners and investors in financial markets and portfolio management. For this purpose, a wide variety of GARCH-type models have been employed. However, there is no consensus in the literature on which specification arising from the volatility equation and the assumed error distribution is better in an out-of-sample performance. This study tries to fill this gap by comparing the forecasting performances of 110 GARCH-type models for Bitcoin volatility. Furthermore, it proposes a new combining method based on support vector machines (SVM). This method effectively selects the set of superior models to perform meta-learning. The results indicate that the best performing GARCH specification depends on the loss function chosen, and the proposed method leads to more accurate volatility forecasts than those of the best GARCH-type models and other combining methods investigated. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]   Ensemble Approaches for Regression: A Survey [J].
Mendes-Moreira, Joao ;
Soares, Carlos ;
Jorge, Alipio Mario ;
De Sousa, Jorge Freire .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2012, 45 (01)
[52]  
Naimy Viviane Y., 2018, International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, V8, P197
[53]   The predictive capacity of GARCH-type models in measuring the volatility of crypto and world currencies [J].
Naimy, Viviane ;
Haddad, Omar ;
Fernandez-Aviles, Gema ;
El Khoury, Rim .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01)
[54]  
Patton A.J., 2009, HDB FINANCIAL TIME S, P801, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-71297-8_36, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-71297-8_36]
[55]   Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies [J].
Patton, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 160 (01) :246-256
[56]   Machine-Learning Models for Sales Time Series Forecasting [J].
Pavlyshenko, Bohdan M. .
DATA, 2019, 4 (01)
[57]   The best of two worlds: Forecasting high frequency volatility for cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies with Support Vector Regression [J].
Peng, Yaohao ;
Melo Albuquerque, Pedro Henrique ;
Camboim de Sa, Jader Martins ;
Akaishi Padula, Ana Julia ;
Montenegro, Mariana Rosa .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 97 :177-192
[58]   Time Series Prediction Using Support Vector Machines: A Survey [J].
Sapankevych, Nicholas L. ;
Sankar, Ravi .
IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2009, 4 (02) :24-38
[59]   Policy uncertainty and Bitcoin returns [J].
Shaikh, Imlak .
BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2020, 20 (03) :257-268
[60]   Forecasting Financial Returns Volatility: A GARCH-SVR Model [J].
Sun, Hao ;
Yu, Bo .
COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 55 (02) :451-471