To Jump or Not to Jump: Mule Deer and White-Tailed Deer Fence Crossing Decisions

被引:22
|
作者
Burkholder, Emily N. [1 ]
Jakes, Andrew F. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Paul F. [2 ]
Hebblewhite, Mark [1 ]
Bishop, Chad J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Alberta Conservat Assoc, 817 4th Ave South 400, Lethbridge, AB T1J 0P3, Canada
[3] Natl Wildlife Federat, Prairies & Pacific Pacif Reg, Northern Rockies, 240 North Higgins Ave,Suite 2, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2018年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
barrier; fence; modification; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; Odocoileus virginianus; white-tailed deer; HABITAT USE; MOVEMENTS; PRONGHORN; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.898
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Modified fencing structures have been recommended with the intention of enhancing ungulate movement. Ungulates such as mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) typically negotiate fences by jumping over them. We examined 2 fine-scale fence crossing decisions to determine factors influencing 1) crossing success and 2) the mode of crossing by 2 sympatric deer species. From 2010 to 2016, we used remote cameras along fence lines in 2 study areas-Canadian Forces Base Suffield in southeastern Alberta, Canada, and The Nature Conservancy's Matador Ranch in north-central Montana, USA-that captured images of deer-fence interactions before and after fence modifications were installed. We used logistic regression to model the probability of deer successfully crossing a fence and mode of crossing (jumping over vs. crawling under) based on fence characteristics and demographic factors. We documented 486 crossing attempts, of which 313 were successful (64.4%), indicating that pasture fences acted as a semipermeable barrier to deer. Of these 313 successful attempts, 152 crawled under the fence (48.6%) as opposed to jumping over it. We documented behavioral differences in mode of crossing between species when successfully crossing a fence. Results indicate that deer are selecting known crossing sites at broad scales as places to negotiate fences, and when assessing finer scale decisions at these sites, white-tailed deer seemed to acclimate better than mule deer to our imposed changes (switched from crawling under to jumping over the fence). Though sample size was low in terms of use at modified fence sites, we recommend visually inconspicuous modifications (such as clips to increase the bottom wire height as opposed to goat-bars) when implementing pasture fencing that was friendlier for deer. We also recommend modifications be implemented strategically; placement of modifications may be just as important to consider as the modification type. (C) 2018 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Landscape structure influences space use by white-tailed deer
    Quinn, Amy C. Dechen
    Williams, David M.
    Porter, William F.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2013, 94 (02) : 398 - 407
  • [32] Habitat Interference by Axis Deer on White-Tailed Deer
    Faas, Clinton J.
    Weckerly, Floyd W.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (04) : 698 - 706
  • [33] Localized management for reducing white-tailed deer populations
    McNulty, SA
    Porter, WF
    Mathews, NE
    Hill, JA
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1997, 25 (02): : 265 - 271
  • [34] White-tailed deer movement in response to helicopter surveys
    Dyal, Jordan R.
    Miller, Karl V.
    Cherry, Michael J.
    D'Angelo, Gino J.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2022, 46 (05):
  • [35] Cellular prion protein distribution in the vomeronasal organ, parotid, and scent glands of white-tailed deer and mule deer
    Ness, Anthony
    Jacob, Aradhana
    Saboraki, Kelsey
    Otero, Alicia
    Gushue, Danielle
    Moreno, Diana Martinez
    de Pena, Melanie
    Tang, Xinli
    Aiken, Judd
    Lingle, Susan
    McKenzie, Debbie
    PRION, 2022, 16 (01) : 40 - 57
  • [36] Population effects of white-tailed deer dispersal
    Rosenberry, CS
    Lancia, RA
    Conner, MC
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1999, 27 (03) : 858 - 864
  • [37] Translocating captive female white-tailed deer
    Elliott, Jace R.
    Newbolt, Chad H.
    Gulsby, William D.
    Ditchkoff, Stephen S.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 50 (02) : 108 - 119
  • [38] A review of color vision in white-tailed deer
    VerCauteren, KC
    Pipas, MJ
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2003, 31 (03): : 684 - 691
  • [39] Chronic wasting disease influences activity and behavior in white-tailed deer
    Edmunds, David R.
    Albeke, Shannon E.
    Grogan, Ronald G.
    Lindzey, Frederick G.
    Legg, David E.
    Cook, Walter E.
    Schumaker, Brant A.
    Kreeger, Terry J.
    Cornish, Todd E.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 82 (01) : 138 - 154
  • [40] Survival of White-Tailed Deer Fawns in the Grasslands of the Northern Great Plains
    Grovenburg, Troy W.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    Jenks, Jonathan A.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (05) : 944 - 956