To Jump or Not to Jump: Mule Deer and White-Tailed Deer Fence Crossing Decisions

被引:22
|
作者
Burkholder, Emily N. [1 ]
Jakes, Andrew F. [1 ,3 ]
Jones, Paul F. [2 ]
Hebblewhite, Mark [1 ]
Bishop, Chad J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Dept Ecosyst & Conservat Sci, WA Franke Coll Forestry & Conservat, 32 Campus Dr, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Alberta Conservat Assoc, 817 4th Ave South 400, Lethbridge, AB T1J 0P3, Canada
[3] Natl Wildlife Federat, Prairies & Pacific Pacif Reg, Northern Rockies, 240 North Higgins Ave,Suite 2, Missoula, MT 59802 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2018年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
barrier; fence; modification; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; Odocoileus virginianus; white-tailed deer; HABITAT USE; MOVEMENTS; PRONGHORN; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.898
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Modified fencing structures have been recommended with the intention of enhancing ungulate movement. Ungulates such as mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) typically negotiate fences by jumping over them. We examined 2 fine-scale fence crossing decisions to determine factors influencing 1) crossing success and 2) the mode of crossing by 2 sympatric deer species. From 2010 to 2016, we used remote cameras along fence lines in 2 study areas-Canadian Forces Base Suffield in southeastern Alberta, Canada, and The Nature Conservancy's Matador Ranch in north-central Montana, USA-that captured images of deer-fence interactions before and after fence modifications were installed. We used logistic regression to model the probability of deer successfully crossing a fence and mode of crossing (jumping over vs. crawling under) based on fence characteristics and demographic factors. We documented 486 crossing attempts, of which 313 were successful (64.4%), indicating that pasture fences acted as a semipermeable barrier to deer. Of these 313 successful attempts, 152 crawled under the fence (48.6%) as opposed to jumping over it. We documented behavioral differences in mode of crossing between species when successfully crossing a fence. Results indicate that deer are selecting known crossing sites at broad scales as places to negotiate fences, and when assessing finer scale decisions at these sites, white-tailed deer seemed to acclimate better than mule deer to our imposed changes (switched from crawling under to jumping over the fence). Though sample size was low in terms of use at modified fence sites, we recommend visually inconspicuous modifications (such as clips to increase the bottom wire height as opposed to goat-bars) when implementing pasture fencing that was friendlier for deer. We also recommend modifications be implemented strategically; placement of modifications may be just as important to consider as the modification type. (C) 2018 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Proximate influences on female dispersal in white-tailed deer
    Lutz, Clayton L.
    Diefenbach, Duane R.
    Rosenberry, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 80 (07) : 1218 - 1226
  • [22] The effect of terrain and female density on survival of neonatal white-tailed deer and mule deer fawns
    Bonar, Maegwin
    Manseau, Micheline
    Geisheimer, Justin
    Bannatyne, Travis
    Lingle, Susan
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 6 (13): : 4387 - 4402
  • [23] Development of a Novel Mule Deer Genomic Assembly and Species-Diagnostic SNP Panel for Assessing Introgression in Mule Deer, White-Tailed Deer, and Their Interspecific Hybrids
    Russell, Ty
    Cullingham, Catherine
    Kommadath, Arun
    Stothard, Paul
    Herbst, Allen
    Coltman, David
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2019, 9 (03): : 911 - 919
  • [24] Health status and relative exposure of mule deer and white-tailed deer to soil contaminants at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal
    Creekmore, TE
    Whittaker, DG
    Roy, RR
    Franson, JC
    Baker, DL
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (02) : 272 - 278
  • [25] Cattle guards reduce white-tailed deer crossings through fence openings
    Belant, JL
    Seamans, TW
    Dwyer, CP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 1998, 44 (04) : 247 - 249
  • [26] Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer
    Bowman, JL
    Kochanny, CO
    Demarais, S
    Leopold, BD
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2000, 28 (01) : 141 - 145
  • [27] Predator evasion by white-tailed deer fawns
    Grovenburg, Troy W.
    Monteith, Kevin L.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    Jenks, Jonathan A.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 84 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [28] Experimental transmission of chronic wasting disease (CWD) of elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) to white-tailed deer by intracerebral route
    Hamir, A. N.
    Richt, J. A.
    Miller, J. M.
    Kunkle, R. A.
    Hall, S. M.
    Nicholson, E. M.
    O'Rourke, K. I.
    Greenlee, J. J.
    Williams, E. S.
    VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 2008, 45 (03) : 297 - 306
  • [29] Influence of landscape characteristics on migration strategies of white-tailed deer
    Grovenburg, Troy W.
    Jacques, Christopher N.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    DePerno, Christopher S.
    Brinkman, Todd J.
    Swanson, Christopher C.
    Jenks, Jonathan A.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2011, 92 (03) : 534 - 543
  • [30] Influence of landscape factors on density of suburban white-tailed deer
    Urbanek, Rachael E.
    Nielsen, Clayton K.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2013, 114 : 28 - 36