Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 1. Case Study for a 1000 MW Ultrasupercritical Utility Boiler

被引:51
|
作者
Liu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Xu, Yishu [1 ]
Zeng, Xianpeng [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [1 ]
Xu, Minghou [1 ]
Pan, Siwei [2 ]
Zhang, Kai [2 ]
Li, Li [2 ]
Gao, Xiangpeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Coal Combust, Luoyu Rd 1037, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Power Grid Corp, Elect Power Res Inst, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Murdoch Univ, Sch Engn & Informat Technol, Discipline Elect Engn Energy & Phys, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FLUE-GAS DESULFURIZATION; PARTICULATE MATTER; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATORS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; FLY-ASH; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; FINE PARTICLES; TRACE-ELEMENTS; SO2; OXIDATION; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00423
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Enlarging the capacity of Utility boiler is recognized. as 4 good way to improve the electricity generating efficiency. An increasing number of 1000 MW ultrasupercritical (USC) utility boilers are installed in China. This contribution reports the results of systematic field measurements on PM2.5 [particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameters < 2.5 mu m] emitted from a 1000 MW USC utility boiler equipped with a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) denitrification (DeNO(x)) unit, two electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), and a limestone-gypsum wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system. The PM samples were collected using a Dekati low pressure impactor (DLPI) and/or a Dekati gravimetric impactor (DGI) at multiple sampling sites. The results demonstrate that the particle size distributions (PSDs) of the PM at both inlet and outlet of the SCR unit exhibit a bimodal distribution, with,a fine mode at < 0.3 mu m and a coarse mode at > 0.3 mu m. Passing the PM-containing flue gas through the SCR leads to the PSDs of the fine mode particles being shifted to larger size, possibly due to the formation of ammonium sulfate and/or ammonium bisulfate as well as the reduction of flue gas temperature. The removal efficiencies of the SCR for PM1 and PM2.5 are 14.3-33.6% and 13.3-30.5%, respectively, depending on the boiler load. The ESPs substantially reduce the mass concentrations of PM1 and PK2.5 from 84.6-107 mg/Nm(3) and 417-440 mg/Nm(3) to 0.298-1.22 mg/Nm(3) and 0.812-4.41 mg/Nm(3), respectively, with overall removal efficiencies of 98.7-99.7% for PM1 and 99.0-99.8%, for PM2.5. The WFGD process leads to the disappearance of the fine mode PM and an overall removal efficiencies of up to 28.7% for PM1 and 39.6% for PM2.5. Moreover, promoting the installation of 1000 MW USC utility boilers is likely to simultaneously achieve the reduction in the PM2.5 emission besides the improvement of electricity generation efficiency, particularly when advanced dust removal devices are employed.
引用
收藏
页码:6547 / 6554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 4. PM Removal Performance of Wet Electrostatic Precipitators
    Xu, Yishu
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Cui, Jiang
    Chen, Dong
    Xu, Minghou
    Pan, Siwei
    Zhang, Kai
    Gao, Xiangpeng
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (09) : 7465 - 7473
  • [2] Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 3. Direct Comparison on the PM Removal Efficiency of Electrostatic Precipitators and Fabric Filters
    Xu, Yishu
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Yu
    Sun, Wei
    Zhou, Zijian
    Xu, Minghou
    Pang, Siwei
    Gao, Xiangpeng
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (07) : 5930 - 5936
  • [3] Discussion on the Emission Control of PM2.5 from Coal-fired Power Plants
    Pan, Xueqin
    Zheng, Jinlang
    Wang, Jianchun
    Jin, Yujian
    Jiang, Minmin
    ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 : 26 - 28
  • [4] Influences of In-Furnace Kaolin Addition on the Formation and Emission Characteristics of PM2.5 in a 1000 MW Coal-Fired Power Station
    Xu, Yishu
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Wang, Hao
    Zeng, Xianpeng
    Zhang, Yufeng
    Han, Jinke
    Xu, Minghou
    Pan, Siwei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (15) : 8718 - 8724
  • [5] Field measurements on the generation and emission characteristics of PM2.5 generated by utility pulverized coal boiler
    Du, Qian
    Dong, Heming
    Lv, Donghui
    Su, Lipeng
    Gao, Jianmin
    Zhao, Zhifeng
    Wang, Min
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2018, 91 (06) : 1009 - 1020
  • [6] The Emission Control Technology of PM2.5 From Coal-fired Plant
    Pan, Weiguo
    Shi, Chaolin
    Li, Fuxiao
    Luo, Hancheng
    Guo, Ruitang
    Ding, Honglei
    Hong, Jienan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2014, 864-867 : 1346 - 1351
  • [7] The sensitivity of health impact assessments of PM2.5 from South African coal-fired power stations
    Simelane, Siyabonga P.
    Langerman, Kristy E.
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2024, 17 (02): : 325 - 340
  • [8] The sensitivity of health impact assessments of PM2.5 from South African coal-fired power stations
    Siyabonga P. Simelane
    Kristy E. Langerman
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2024, 17 : 325 - 340
  • [9] Advances in the study of the effects of pollutant removal equipment on PM2.5 emissions in coal-fired power plants
    Xia, Yimin
    Wu, Jianqun
    Yang, Song
    Yu, Dunxi
    Xu, Minghou
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2021, 46 (11): : 3645 - 3656
  • [10] Field Measurements on the Emission and Removal of PM2.5 from Coal-Fired Power Stations: 2. Studies on Two 135 MW Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers Respectively Equipped with an Electrostatic Precipitator and a Hybrid Electrostatic Filter Precipitator
    Liu, Xiaowei
    Xu, Yishu
    Fan, Bin
    Lv, Chen
    Xu, Minghou
    Pan, Siwei
    Zhang, Kai
    Li, Li
    Gao, Xiangpeng
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2016, 30 (07) : 5922 - 5929