Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges

被引:296
作者
Ciarli, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Kenney, Martin [5 ]
Massini, Silvia [3 ]
Piscitello, Lucia [4 ]
机构
[1] UNU MERIT, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
JOB POLARIZATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; LABOR SHARE; INEQUALITY; AUTOMATION; EMPLOYMENT; COMPUTERS; FUTURE; GROWTH; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In order to better understand the complex and dialectical relationships between digital technologies, innovation, and skills, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the coevolution between the trajectories of connected digital technologies, firm innovation routines, and skills formation. This is critical as organizations recombine and adapt digital technologies; they require new skills to innovate, learn, and adapt to evolving digital technologies, while digital technologies change the codification of knowledge for productive and innovative activities. The coevolution between digital technologies, innovation, and skills also requires, and is driven by, a reorganization of productive and innovation processes, both within and between firms. We observe this in all economic sectors, from agriculture to services. Based on evidence on past technologies and the innovation literature, we suggest that we might require a new set of stylized facts to better map the main future trajectories of digital technologies, their adoption, use, and recombination in organizations, to improve our understanding of their impact on productivity, employment and inequality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 132 条
[71]  
Freeman R, 2007, LABOR MARKET I WORLD, DOI [10.3386/w13242,13242, DOI 10.3386/W13242,13242]
[72]   Within-Occupation Changes Dominate Changes in What Workers Do: A Shift-Share Decomposition, 2005-2015 [J].
Freeman, Richard B. ;
Ganguli, Ina ;
Handel, Michael J. .
AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 110 :394-399
[73]   The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? [J].
Frey, Carl Benedikt ;
Osborne, Michael A. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 114 :254-280
[74]   Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness [J].
Garud, Raghu ;
Jain, Sanjay ;
Tuertscher, Philipp .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2008, 29 (03) :351-371
[75]  
Goos M., 2020, ROUTINE BIASED TECHN
[76]   Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain [J].
Goos, Maarten ;
Manning, Alan .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (01) :118-133
[77]   Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring [J].
Goos, Maarten ;
Manning, Alan ;
Salomons, Anna .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (08) :2509-2526
[78]   Job Polarization in Europe [J].
Goos, Maarten ;
Manning, Alan ;
Salomons, Anna .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :58-63
[79]   Secular Stagnation: A Supply-Side View [J].
Gordon, Robert J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (05) :54-59
[80]  
Haldane A G, 2017, Productivity puzzles-speech