Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine-Bupivacaine versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Plus Intrathecal Bupivacaine: A Randomised Triple-blind Clinical Study

被引:1
|
作者
Moolagani, Venkata Ramanareddy [1 ]
Vigrahala, Padmavathi [1 ]
Korra, Gopa Naik [1 ]
Duba, Bala Krishna [1 ]
机构
[1] Gayatri Vidya Parishad Inst Heath Care & Med Tech, Dept Anaesthesiol, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Adjuvant; Analgesia; Motor block; Sensory block; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; ALPHA-2-ADRENOCEPTOR AGONIST; BLOCK; ROPIVACAINE; SEDATION;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2022/56621.16587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: For administering Spinal Anesthesia (SA) 0.5% bupivacaine is employed with Dexmedetomidine (DMT) as an adjuvant. Literature review reveals that either intrathecal or low-dose intravenous DMT can enhance the characteristics of SA with bupivacaine Aim: To evaluate the effect of a single bolus intravenous (i.v.) DMT 0.5 mu g/kg given either before or after the SA in combination with intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine compared with intrathecal bupivacaine plus DMT. Materials and Methods: A randomised, triple-blind, single-centre and placebo-controlled study was conducted at Gayatri Vidyaparishad Institute of Health care and medical technology, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, from April 2020 to December 2021. Eighty patients were allocated to four study groups of 20 each. Patients of group Intrathecal DMT (ITD) were given SA with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy 3.4 mL+5 mu g DMT, patients of group Before Spinal DMT (BSD) were given intravenous DMT before administering the SA with bupivacaine, patients of group After Spinal DMT (ASD) were given intravenous DMT after administering the SA with bupivacaine, and the patients of group Nil DMT (ND) or control group, were given SA with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy 3.4 mL. The primary outcome variable was the difference in the duration of analgesia. The secondary outcome variables were the differences in the onset and duration of the block both motor and sensory. Differences of the parametric data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Post Hoc test HSD Beta (Honestly significant difference). For analysis of non parametric data Chisquare test was used and a p-value of =0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Patients in the ITD group had a longer duration of analgesia of 280.7 +/- 5.0 min (vis-a-vis 215 +/- 9.34, 210.7 +/- 12.0 and 97.9 +/- 7.12 min in BSD,ASD and ND, respectively) with a statistically significant difference at a p-value <0.00001. They had a shorter duration of onset of motor block of 3.4 +/- 0.49 (visa-vis 4.6 +/- 0.53, 6.09 +/- 0.44 and 6.3 +/- 0.65 in BSD, ASD and ND groups, respectively) with a statistically significant difference at a p-value <0.00001. Duration of onset of the sensory block was 2.2 +/- 0.37 min in the patients of ITD group (vis-a-vis 3.2 +/- 4.76, 3.5 +/- 6.71 and 4 +/- 0.40 in BSD,ASD and ND groups, respectively) with a statistically significant difference at a p-value <0.00001. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine used as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine produces greater augmentation of duration of analgesia, earlier onset of sensory and motor block, more haemodynamic stability and fewer overall side effects compared to its intravenous bolus administration.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 26
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE PLUS INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE VS INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE ALONE FOR PROLONGATION OF SPINAL ANALGESIA
    Rani, H. L.
    Upendranath, I.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (94): : 15952 - 15959
  • [2] Effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus intravenous dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine
    Sharma, Anshu
    Varghese, Nita
    Venkateswaran, Ramkumar
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 (03) : 381 - 385
  • [3] Effects of intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl versus bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in diabetic surgical patients
    Tarbeeh, Gehan A.
    Mohamed, Ayman A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 29 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [4] Comparison of the Effects of Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia
    Samantaray, Aloka
    Hemanth, Natham
    Gunnampati, Karunakar
    Pasupuleti, Hemalatha
    Mukkara, Madhusudan
    Rao, Mangu Hanumantha
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [5] Comparison of bupivacaine plus intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine alone for spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial
    Park, Sun-Kyung
    Lee, Joon Hee
    Yoo, Seokha
    Kim, Won Ho
    Lim, Young-Jin
    Bahk, Jae-Hyon
    Kim, Jin-Tae
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (04) : 459 - 465
  • [6] Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Infraumbilical Surgeries
    Patro, Sisinti Sanjeeb
    Deshmukh, Hemant
    Ramani, Yerramalli Roja
    Das, Gitanjali
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (03) : UC13 - UC16
  • [7] Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Deotale, Anuradha
    Kadam, Sandeep S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (08) : UC16 - UC19
  • [8] A Clinical Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine with Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Vaginal Hysterectomy
    Manik, Yogesh Kumar
    Singh, Navab
    Vedprakash
    Dhama, Vipin
    Subhash
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (17): : 1405 - 1411
  • [9] Comparative Evaluation of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone, Bupivacaine-fentanyl, and Bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine in Caesarean Section
    Sun, Y.
    Xu, Y.
    Wang, G-N.
    DRUG RESEARCH, 2015, 65 (09) : 468 - 472
  • [10] COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE AND INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES. A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Leelavathy, P. B.
    Iqbal, Salim
    Fathima, Ahmedi
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (41): : 2643 - 2646