Validation of the online prediction tool PREDICT v. 2.0 in the Dutch breast cancer population

被引:38
作者
van Maaren, M. C. [1 ,2 ]
van Steenbeek, C. D. [1 ,2 ]
Pharoah, P. D. P. [3 ]
Witteveen, A. [2 ]
Sonke, G. S. [4 ]
Strobbe, L. J. A. [5 ]
Poortmans, P. M. P. [6 ]
Siesling, S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge, England
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Inst Curie, Dept Radiat Oncol, Paris, France
关键词
PREDICT; Prediction model; Breast cancer; Validation; Overall survival; Population-based study; PROGNOSTIC MODEL PREDICT; ADJUVANT ONLINE; OLDER PATIENTS; PROGRAM; SURVIVAL; VALIDITY; COHORT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: PREDICT version 2.0 is increasingly used to estimate prognosis in breast cancer. This study aimed to validate this tool in specific prognostic subgroups in the Netherlands. Methods: All operated women with non-metastatic primary invasive breast cancer, diagnosed in 2005, were selected from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Predicted and observed 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were compared for the overall cohort, separated by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, and predefined subgroups. A > 5% difference was considered as clinically relevant. Discriminatory accuracy and goodness-of-fit were determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Chi-squared-test. Results: We included 8834 patients. Discriminatory accuracy for 5-year OS was good (AUC 0.80). For ER-positive and ER-negative patients, AUCs were 0.79 and 0.75, respectively. Predicted 5-year OS differed from observed by -1.4% in the entire cohort, -0.7% in ER-positive and -4.9% in ER-negative patients. Five-year OS was accurately predicted in all subgroups. Discriminatory accuracy for 10-year OS was good (AUC 0.78). For ER-positive and ER-negative patients AUCs were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. Predicted 10-year OS differed from observed by -1.0% in the entire cohort, -0.1% in ER-positive and -5.3 in ER-negative patients. Ten-year OS was overestimated (6.3%) in patients >= 75 years and underestimated (-13.%) in T3 tumours and patients treated with both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy (-6.6%). Conclusions: PREDICT predicts OS reliably in most Dutch breast cancer patients, although results for both 5-year and 10-year OS should be interpreted carefully in ER-negative patients. Furthermore, 10-year OS should be interpreted cautiously in patients >= 75 years, T3 tumours and in patients considering endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 372
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Adjuvant! Online is overoptimistic in predicting survival of Asian breast cancer patients [J].
Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala ;
Yip, Cheng-Har ;
Hartman, Mikael ;
Saxena, Nakul ;
Taib, Nur Aishah ;
Ho, Gwo-Fuang ;
Looi, Lai-Meng ;
Bulgiba, Awang M. ;
van der Graaf, Yolanda ;
Verkooijen, Helena M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (07) :982-989
[3]   An investigation into the performance of the Adjuvant! Online prognostic programme in early breast cancer for a cohort of patients in the United Kingdom [J].
Campbell, H. E. ;
Taylor, M. A. ;
Harris, A. L. ;
Gray, A. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (07) :1074-1084
[4]   An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation [J].
Candido dos Reis, Francisco J. ;
Wishart, Gordon C. ;
Dicks, Ed M. ;
Greenberg, David ;
Rashbass, Jem ;
Schmidt, Marjanka K. ;
van den Broek, Alexandra J. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Green, Andrew ;
Rakha, Emad ;
Maishman, Tom ;
Eccles, Diana M. ;
Pharoah, Paul D. P. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
[5]   Validity of the online PREDICT tool in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study [J].
de Glas, N. A. ;
Bastiaannet, E. ;
Engels, C. C. ;
de Craen, A. J. M. ;
Putter, H. ;
van de Velde, C. J. H. ;
Hurria, A. ;
Liefers, G. J. ;
Portielje, J. E. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (04) :395-400
[6]   Validity of Adjuvant! Online program in older patients with breast cancer: a population-based study [J].
de Glas, Nienke A. ;
van de Water, Willemien ;
Engelhardt, Ellen G. ;
Bastiaannet, Esther ;
de Craen, Anton J. M. ;
Kroep, Judith R. ;
Putter, Hein ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Weijl, Nir I. ;
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H. ;
Portielje, Johanneke E. A. ;
Liefers, Gerrit-Jan .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (07) :722-729
[7]   Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
A'Hern, Roger ;
Bartlett, John ;
Coombes, R. Charles ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Ellis, Matthew ;
Henry, N. Lynn ;
Hugh, Judith C. ;
Lively, Tracy ;
McShane, Lisa ;
Paik, Soon ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
Prudkin, Ljudmila ;
Regan, Meredith ;
Salter, Janine ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Smith, Ian E. ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (22) :1656-1664
[8]  
Eastern Cancer Registry and Information Centre, 2017, PREDICT
[9]   Accuracy of the online prognostication tools PREDICT and Adjuvant! for early-stage breast cancer patients younger than 50 years [J].
Engelhardt, Ellen G. ;
van den Broek, Alexandra J. ;
Linn, Sabine C. ;
Wishart, Gordon C. ;
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th. ;
van de Velde, Anthonie O. ;
Smit, Vincent T. H. B. M. ;
Voogd, Adri C. ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
Brinkhuis, Mariel ;
Seynaeve, Caroline ;
Westenend, Pieter J. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M. ;
van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
van 't Veer, Laura J. ;
Ravdin, Peter M. ;
Pharaoh, Paul D. P. ;
Schmidt, Marjanka K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 78 :37-44
[10]   Breast cancer specialists' views on and use of risk prediction models in clinical practice: A mixed methods approach [J].
Engelhardt, Ellen G. ;
Pieterse, Arwen H. ;
van Duijn-Bakker, Nanny ;
Kroep, Judith R. ;
de Haes, Hanneke C. J. M. ;
Smets, Ellen M. A. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (03) :361-367