共 50 条
Efficacy of mesalazine in the treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease
被引:86
|作者:
Di Mario, F
Aragona, G
Leandro, G
Comparato, G
Fanigliulo, L
Cavallaro, LG
Cavestro, GM
Iori, V
Maino, M
Moussa, AM
Gnocchi, A
Mazzocchi, G
Franzé, A
机构:
[1] Univ Parma, Dipartimento Sci Clin, Sez Gastroenterol, Chair Gastroenterol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] IRCCS, Gastroenterol Hosp S De Bellis, Bari, Italy
[3] Az Osped, Gastroenterol & Endoscpy Unit, Parma, Italy
[4] AUSL, UO Chirurg Borgovalditaro, Parma, Italy
关键词:
mesalazine;
diverticular disease;
diverticula;
rifaximin;
D O I:
10.1007/s10620-005-2478-z
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
We aimed to improve symptoms by means of mesalazine in symptomatic colonic diverticular disease patients. One hundred seventy outpatients (98 M, 72 F; age, 67.1 years; range, 39-84 years) were assigned to four different schedules: rifaximin, 200 mg bid (Group R1: 39 pts), rifaximin, 400 mg bid (Group R2: 43 pts), mesalazine, 400 mg bid (Group M1: 40 pts), and mesalazine, 800 mg bid (Group M2: 48 pts), for 10 days per month. At baseline and after 3 months we recorded 11 clinical variables (upper/lower abdominal pain/discomfort, bloating, tenesmus, diarrhea, abdominal tenderness, fever, general illness, nausea, emesis, dysuria), scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe. The global symptomatic score was the sum of all symptom scores. After 3 months in all schedules but Group R1, 3 of the 11 symptoms improved (P < 0.03); the global score decreased in all groups but Group R1 (P < 0.0001). Mesalazine-treated patients had the lowest global score at 3 months (P < 0.001). Mesalazine is as effective as rifaximin (higher dosage schedule) for diminishing some symptoms, but it appears to be better than rifaximin for improving the global score in those patients.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文