Effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on platelet function in fibrinolytic-treated STEMI patients undergoing early PCI

被引:33
作者
Dehghani, Payam [1 ]
Lavoie, Andrea [1 ]
Lavi, Shahar [2 ]
Crawford, Jennifer J. [1 ]
Harenberg, Sebastian [1 ]
Zimmermann, Rodney H. [1 ]
Booker, Jeff [1 ]
Kelly, Sheila [1 ]
Cantor, Warren J. [3 ]
Mehta, Shamir R. [4 ]
Bagai, Akshay [5 ]
Goodman, Shaun G. [5 ]
Cheema, Asim N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Prairie Vasc Res Network & Regina QuAppelle Hlth, Regina, SK, Canada
[2] Univ London, London Hlth Sci, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Terrence Donnelly Heart Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HIGH-DOSE CLOPIDOGREL; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; DIABETES-MELLITUS; ARTERY-DISEASE; REACTIVITY; PRASUGREL; OUTCOMES; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2017.07.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Patients undergoing PCI early after fibrinolytic therapy are at high risk for both thrombotic and bleeding complications. We sought to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in the fibrinolytic-treated STEMI patients undergoing early PCI. Methods and results Patients undergoing PCI within 24 hours of tenecteplase (TNK), aspirin, and clopidogrel for STEMI were randomized to receive additional clopidogrel 300 mg followed by 75 mg daily or ticagrelor 180 mg followed by 90 mg twice daily. The platelet reactivity units (PRU) were measured with the VerifyNow Assay before study drug administration (baseline) at 4 and 24 hours post-PCI. The primary end point was PRU <= 208 at 4 hours. A total of 140 patients (74 in ticagrelor and 66 in clopidogrel group) were enrolled. The mean PRU values at baseline were similar for the 2 groups (257.8 +/- 52.9 vs 259.5 +/- 56.7, P =.85, respectively). Post-PCI, patients on ticagrelor, compared to those on clopidogrel, had significantly lower PRU at 4 hours (78.7 +/- 88 vs 193.6 +/- 86.5, respectively, P < .001) and at 24 hours (34.5 +/- 35.0 and 153.5 +/- 75.5, respectively, P < .001). The primary end point was observed in 87.8% (n = 65) in the ticagrelor-treated patients compared to 57.6% (n = 38) of clopidogrel-treated patients, P < .001. Conclusion Fibrinolysis-treated STEMI patients who received clopidogrel and aspirin at the time of fibrinolysis and were undergoing early PCI frequently had PRU N208. In this high-risk population, ticagrelor provides more prompt and potent platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel (Funded by Astra Zeneca; NCT01930591, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01930591).
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Ticagrelor versus high dose clopidogrel in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with high platelet reactivity post fibrinolysis
    Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
    Perperis, Angelos
    Koniari, Ioanna
    Karvounis, Haralambos
    Patsilinakos, Sotirios
    Ziakas, Antonios
    Barampoutis, Nikolaos
    Panagiotidis, Theofilos
    Akinosoglou, Karolina
    Hahalis, George
    Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2015, 40 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [2] Randomized Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel Antiplatelet Effects in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
    Xanthopoulou, Ioanna
    Gkizas, Vassilios
    Kassimis, George
    Theodoropoulos, Konstantinos C.
    Makris, George
    Koutsogiannis, Nikolaos
    Damelou, Anastasia
    Tsigkas, Grigorios
    Davlouros, Periklis
    Hahalis, George
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (06) : 797 - 804
  • [3] A randomized study assessing the impact of cilostazol on platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy: results of the OPTIMUS-2 study
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    Capranzano, Piera
    Goto, Shinya
    Aslam, Mohammed
    Desai, Bhaloo
    Charlton, Ronald K.
    Suzuki, Yoshie
    Box, Lyndon C.
    Shoemaker, Steven B.
    Zenni, Martin M.
    Guzman, Luis A.
    Bass, Theodore A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (18) : 2202 - 2211
  • [4] A pharmacodynamic comparison of prasugrel vs. high-dose clopidogrel in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of the Optimizing anti-Platelet Therapy In diabetes MellitUS (OPTIMUS)-3 Trial
    Angiolillo, Dominick J.
    JoseBadimon, Juan
    Saucedo, Jorge F.
    Frelinger, Andrew L.
    Michelson, Alan D.
    Jakubowski, Joseph A.
    Zhu, Baojin
    Ojeh, Clement K.
    Baker, Brian A.
    Effron, Mark B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (07) : 838 - 846
  • [5] [Anonymous], J THROMB THROMBOLYSI
  • [6] Platelet function monitoring in patients on clopidogrel: What should we learn from GRAVITAS?
    Aradi, Daniel
    Komocsi, Andras
    [J]. PLATELETS, 2012, 23 (03) : 167 - 176
  • [7] Reperfusion Paradox in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Boden, William E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (06) : 389 - 391
  • [8] Commentary: The role of percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation myocardial infarction
    Bates, Eric R.
    Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (05) : 567 - 573
  • [9] Early routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis vs. standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis
    Borgia, Francesco
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Halvorsen, Sigrun
    Cantor, Warren J.
    Piscione, Federico
    Le May, Michel R.
    Fernandez-Aviles, Francisco
    Sanchez, Pedro L.
    Dimopoulos, Konstantinos
    Scheller, Bruno
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Di Mario, Carlo
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (17) : 2156 - 2169
  • [10] Prospective Evaluation of On-Clopidogrel Platelet Reactivity Over Time in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Relationship With Gene Polymorphisms and Clinical Outcome
    Campo, Gianluca
    Parrinello, Giovanni
    Ferraresi, Paolo
    Lunghi, Barbara
    Tebaldi, Matteo
    Miccoli, Matteo
    Marchesini, Jlenia
    Bernardi, Francesco
    Ferrari, Roberto
    Valgimigli, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (25) : 2474 - 2483