Off-axis dose response characteristics of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device

被引:34
|
作者
Greer, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Newcastle Hosp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
amorphous silicon; dose verification; EPID;
D O I
10.1118/1.2779944
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have typically been calibrated to dose at central axis (CAX). Division of acquired images by the flood-field (FF) image that corrects for pixel sensitivity variation as well as open field energy-dependent off-axis response variation should result in a flat EPID response over the entire matrix for the same field size. While the beam profile can be reintroduced to the image by an additional correction matrix, the CAX EPID response to dose calibration factor is assumed to apply to all pixels in the detector. The aim of this work was to investigate the dose response of the Varian aS500 amorphous silicon detector across the entire detector area. First it was established that the EPID response across the panel becarne stable (within similar to 0.2%) for MU settings greater than similar to 200 MU. The EPID was then FF calibrated with a high MU setting of similar to 400 for all subsequent experiments. Whole detector images with varying MU settings from 2-500 were then acquired for two dose rates (300 and 600 MU/min) for 6 MV photons for two EPIDs. The FF corrected EPID response was approximately flat or uniform across the detector for greater than 100 MU delivered (within 0.5%). However, the off-axis EPID response was greater than the CAX response for small MU irradiations, giving a raised EPID profile. Up to 5% increase in response at 20 cm off-axis compared to CAX was found for very small MU settings for one EPID, while it was within 2% for the second (newer) EPID. Off-axis response nonuniformities attributed to detector damage were also found for the older EPID. Similar results were obtained with the EPID at 18 MV energy and operating in asynchronous mode (acquisition not synchronized with beam pulses), however the profiles were flatter and more irregular for the small MU irradiations. By moving the detector laterally and repeating the experiments, the increase in response off-axis was found to depend on the pixel position relative to the beam CAX. When the beam was heavily filtered by a phantom the off-axis response variation was reduced markedly to within 0.5% for all MU settings. Independent measurements of off-axis point doses with ion chamber did not show any change in off-axis factor with MUs. Measurements of beam quality (TMR20-10) for MU settings of 2, 5, and 100 at central axis and at 15 cm off-axis could not explain the effect. The response change is unlikely to be significant for clinical IMRT verification with this imaging/acclerator system where MUs are of the order of 100-300, provided the detector does not exhibit radiation damage artifacts. (C) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3815 / 3824
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device
    Sumida, Iori
    Yamaguchi, Hajime
    Das, Indra J.
    Kizaki, Hisao
    Aboshi, Keiko
    Tsujii, Mari
    Yamada, Yuji
    Suzuki, Osamu
    Seo, Yuji
    Isohashi, Fumiaki
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 259 - 271
  • [42] Analysis of interfraction and intrafraction variation during tangential breast irradiation with an electronic portal imaging device
    Smith, RP
    Bloch, P
    Harris, E
    McDonough, J
    Sarkar, A
    Kassaee, A
    Avery, S
    Solin, LJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02): : 373 - 378
  • [43] Development and testing of an improved dosimetry system using a backscatter shielded electronic portal imaging device
    King, Brian W.
    Morf, Daniel
    Greer, Peter B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) : 2839 - 2847
  • [44] Clinical Feasibility of Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Position Verification during Conventional Radiotherapy
    Shen, Yuxiaotong
    Zhang, Jie
    Ge, Yun
    Chen, Ying
    Li, Haiwei
    Sun, Wei
    Ji, Mingxi
    Wei, Quanbo
    Cai, Jing
    Li, Bing
    2016 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NANO/MOLECULAR MEDICINE AND ENGINEERING (NANOMED), 2016, : 99 - 103
  • [45] (Non)-migration of radiopaque markers used for on-line localization of the prostate with an electronic portal imaging device
    Pouliot, J
    Aubin, M
    Langen, KM
    Liu, YM
    Pickett, B
    Shinohara, K
    Roach, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (03): : 862 - 866
  • [46] A test tool for the visual verification of light and radiation fields using film or an electronic portal imaging device
    Dunscombe, P
    Humphreys, S
    Leszczynski, K
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (02) : 239 - 243
  • [47] Performance of a linear accelerator couch positioning quality control task using an electronic portal imaging device
    Afzalifar, A.
    Mowlavi, A. A.
    Mohammadi, M.
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 13 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [48] A Monte Carlo calculation model of electronic portal imaging device for transit dosimetry through heterogeneous media
    Yoon, Jihyung
    Jung, Jae Won
    Kim, Jong Oh
    Yeo, Inhwan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (05) : 2242 - 2250
  • [49] Performance of a linear accelerator couch positioning quality control task using an electronic portal imaging device
    A. Afzalifar
    A. A. Mowlavi
    M. Mohammadi
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2020, 13 : 195 - 200
  • [50] Three year experience of electronic portal imaging device based daily QA for photon radiation beams
    Cai, Bin
    He, Yu
    Bollinger, Douglas
    Li, Hua
    Goddu, Sreekrishna M.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Sun, Baozhou
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2019, 5 (01):