Off-axis dose response characteristics of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device

被引:34
|
作者
Greer, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Newcastle Hosp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
amorphous silicon; dose verification; EPID;
D O I
10.1118/1.2779944
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Amorphous silicon (a-Si) electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) have typically been calibrated to dose at central axis (CAX). Division of acquired images by the flood-field (FF) image that corrects for pixel sensitivity variation as well as open field energy-dependent off-axis response variation should result in a flat EPID response over the entire matrix for the same field size. While the beam profile can be reintroduced to the image by an additional correction matrix, the CAX EPID response to dose calibration factor is assumed to apply to all pixels in the detector. The aim of this work was to investigate the dose response of the Varian aS500 amorphous silicon detector across the entire detector area. First it was established that the EPID response across the panel becarne stable (within similar to 0.2%) for MU settings greater than similar to 200 MU. The EPID was then FF calibrated with a high MU setting of similar to 400 for all subsequent experiments. Whole detector images with varying MU settings from 2-500 were then acquired for two dose rates (300 and 600 MU/min) for 6 MV photons for two EPIDs. The FF corrected EPID response was approximately flat or uniform across the detector for greater than 100 MU delivered (within 0.5%). However, the off-axis EPID response was greater than the CAX response for small MU irradiations, giving a raised EPID profile. Up to 5% increase in response at 20 cm off-axis compared to CAX was found for very small MU settings for one EPID, while it was within 2% for the second (newer) EPID. Off-axis response nonuniformities attributed to detector damage were also found for the older EPID. Similar results were obtained with the EPID at 18 MV energy and operating in asynchronous mode (acquisition not synchronized with beam pulses), however the profiles were flatter and more irregular for the small MU irradiations. By moving the detector laterally and repeating the experiments, the increase in response off-axis was found to depend on the pixel position relative to the beam CAX. When the beam was heavily filtered by a phantom the off-axis response variation was reduced markedly to within 0.5% for all MU settings. Independent measurements of off-axis point doses with ion chamber did not show any change in off-axis factor with MUs. Measurements of beam quality (TMR20-10) for MU settings of 2, 5, and 100 at central axis and at 15 cm off-axis could not explain the effect. The response change is unlikely to be significant for clinical IMRT verification with this imaging/acclerator system where MUs are of the order of 100-300, provided the detector does not exhibit radiation damage artifacts. (C) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3815 / 3824
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of a megavoltage electronic portal imaging device to identify prosthetic materials
    Moutrie, Vaughan
    Kairn, Tanya
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    Charles, Paul H.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2015, 38 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [22] Use of a megavoltage electronic portal imaging device to identify prosthetic materials
    Vaughan Moutrie
    Tanya Kairn
    Anatoly Rosenfeld
    Paul H. Charles
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2015, 38 : 93 - 100
  • [23] Four-dimensional dose reconstruction through in vivo phase matching of cine images of electronic portal imaging device
    Yoon, Jihyung
    Jung, Jae Won
    Kim, Jong Oh
    Yi, Byong Yong
    Yeo, Inhwan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (07) : 4420 - 4430
  • [24] A new approach for the pixel map sensitivity (PMS) evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device (EPID)
    Boriano, Alberto
    Lucio, Francesco
    Calamia, Elisa
    Russi, Elvio
    Marchetto, Flavio
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (06): : 234 - 250
  • [25] Improving IMRT quality control efficiency using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imager
    Budgell, GJ
    Zhang, Q
    Trouncer, RJ
    Mackay, RI
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (11) : 3267 - 3278
  • [26] Verification of multileaf collimator leaf positions using an electronic portal imaging device
    Samant, SS
    Zheng, W
    Parra, NA
    Chandler, J
    Gopal, A
    Wu, J
    Jain, J
    Zhu, YP
    Sontag, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (12) : 2900 - 2912
  • [27] Electronic Portal Imaging Device Dosimetry for IMRT: a Review on Commercially Available Solutions
    Bawazeer, Omemh
    Herath, Sisira
    Sarasanandarajah, Siva
    Deb, Pradip
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 553 - 556
  • [28] Clinical practice and evaluation of electronic portal imaging device for VMAT quality assurance
    Huang, Yen-Cho
    Yeh, Chien-Yi
    Yeh, Jih-Hsiang
    Lo, Ching-Jung
    Tsai, Ping-Fang
    Hung, Chih-Hung
    Tsai, Chieh-Sheng
    Chen, Chen-Yuan
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [29] The use of extended dose range film for dosimetric calibration of a scanning liquid-filled ionization chamber electronic portal imaging device
    Mohammadi, Mohammad
    Bezak, Eva
    Reich, Paul
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (01): : 69 - 84
  • [30] Quality assurance of MLC leaf position accuracy and relative dose effect at the MLC abutment region using an electronic portal imaging device
    Sumida, Iori
    Yamaguchi, Hajime
    Kizaki, Hisao
    Koizumi, Masahiko
    Ogata, Toshiyuki
    Takahashi, Yutaka
    Yoshioka, Yasuo
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (05) : 798 - 806