Uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval design for phase I dose-finding trials

被引:6
作者
Lin, Ruitao [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Guosheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Northeast Normal Univ, MOE, Key Lab Appl Stat, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Bayes factor; dose finding; interval design; maximum tolerated dose; uniformly most powerful Bayesian test; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CLINICAL-TRIALS; OVERDOSE CONTROL; PANCREATIC-CANCER; TOXICITY; ESCALATION; GEMCITABINE; PANITUMUMAB;
D O I
10.1002/pst.1889
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Interval designs have recently attracted much attention in phase I clinical trials because of their simplicity and desirable finite-sample performance. However, existing interval designs typically cannot converge to the optimal dose level since their intervals do not shrink to the target toxicity probability as the sample size increases. The uniformly most powerful Bayesian test (UMPBT) is an objective Bayesian hypothesis testing procedure, which results in the largest probability that the Bayes factor against null hypothesis exceeds the evidence threshold for all possible values of the data generating parameter. On the basis of the rejection region of UMPBT, we develop the uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval (UMPBI) design for phase I dose-finding trials. The proposed UMPBI design enjoys convergence properties because the induced interval indeed shrinks to the toxicity target and the recommended dose converges to the true maximum tolerated dose as the sample size increases. Moreover, it possesses an optimality property that the probability of incorrect decisions is minimized. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the competitive finite-sample operating characteristics of the UMPBI in comparison with other existing interval designs. As an illustration, we apply the UMPBI design to a panitumumab and standard gemcitabine-based chemoradiation combination trial.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 724
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Cumulative cohort design for dose-finding [J].
Ivanova, Anastasia ;
Flournoy, Nancy ;
Chung, Yeonseung .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2007, 137 (07) :2316-2327
[12]   Escalation, group and A+B designs for dose-finding trials [J].
Ivanova, Anastasia .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (21) :3668-3678
[13]   From XenoMouse technology to panitumumab, the first fully human antibody product from transgenic mice [J].
Jakobovits, Aya ;
Amad, Rafael G. ;
Yang, Xiaodong ;
RoskoS, Lorin ;
Schwab, Gisela .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2007, 25 (10) :1134-1143
[14]   Modified Toxicity Probability Interval Design: A Safer and More Reliable Method Than the 3+3 Design for Practical Phase I Trials [J].
Ji, Yuan ;
Wang, Sue-Jane .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (14) :1785-+
[15]   A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials [J].
Ji, Yuan ;
Liu, Ping ;
Li, Yisheng ;
Bekele, B. Nebiyou .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 7 (06) :653-663
[16]   UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL BAYESIAN TESTS [J].
Johnson, Valen E. .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2013, 41 (04) :1716-1741
[17]   Model calibration in the continual reassessment method [J].
Lee, Shing M. ;
Cheung, Ying Kuen .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 6 (03) :227-238
[18]   Nonparametric overdose control with late-onset toxicity in phase I clinical trials [J].
Lin, Ruitao ;
Yin, Guosheng .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2017, 18 (01) :180-194
[19]  
Lin Y, 2001, Biostatistics, V2, P203, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/2.2.203
[20]   Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials [J].
Liu, Suyu ;
Yuan, Ying .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2015, 64 (03) :507-523