Uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval design for phase I dose-finding trials

被引:6
作者
Lin, Ruitao [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Guosheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Northeast Normal Univ, MOE, Key Lab Appl Stat, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Bayes factor; dose finding; interval design; maximum tolerated dose; uniformly most powerful Bayesian test; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CLINICAL-TRIALS; OVERDOSE CONTROL; PANCREATIC-CANCER; TOXICITY; ESCALATION; GEMCITABINE; PANITUMUMAB;
D O I
10.1002/pst.1889
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Interval designs have recently attracted much attention in phase I clinical trials because of their simplicity and desirable finite-sample performance. However, existing interval designs typically cannot converge to the optimal dose level since their intervals do not shrink to the target toxicity probability as the sample size increases. The uniformly most powerful Bayesian test (UMPBT) is an objective Bayesian hypothesis testing procedure, which results in the largest probability that the Bayes factor against null hypothesis exceeds the evidence threshold for all possible values of the data generating parameter. On the basis of the rejection region of UMPBT, we develop the uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval (UMPBI) design for phase I dose-finding trials. The proposed UMPBI design enjoys convergence properties because the induced interval indeed shrinks to the toxicity target and the recommended dose converges to the true maximum tolerated dose as the sample size increases. Moreover, it possesses an optimality property that the probability of incorrect decisions is minimized. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate the competitive finite-sample operating characteristics of the UMPBI in comparison with other existing interval designs. As an illustration, we apply the UMPBI design to a panitumumab and standard gemcitabine-based chemoradiation combination trial.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 724
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ahn C, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1537, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980730)17:14<1537::AID-SIM872>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-F
[3]  
Babb J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1103, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1103::AID-SIM793>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-9
[5]   Approximate Dynamic Programming and Its Applications to the Design of Phase I Cancer Trials [J].
Bartroff, Jay ;
Lai, Tze Leung .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 25 (02) :245-257
[6]   Toxicity equivalence range design (TEQR): A practical Phase I design [J].
Blanchard, M. Suzette ;
Longmate, Jeffrey A. .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 32 (01) :114-121
[7]   Coherence principles in dose-finding studies [J].
Cheung, YK .
BIOMETRIKA, 2005, 92 (04) :863-873
[8]  
Chevret S., 2006, Statistical Methods for Dose-Finding Experiments
[9]   A random walk rule for phase I clinical trials [J].
Durham, SD ;
Flournoy, N ;
Rosenberger, WF .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) :745-760
[10]   Group up-and-down designs for dose-finding [J].
Gezmu, M ;
Flournoy, N .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2006, 136 (06) :1749-1764