Oaks were the historical foundation genus of the east-central United States

被引:74
作者
Hanberry, Brice B. [1 ]
Nowacki, Gregory J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, 203 Nat Resources Bldg, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] USDA Forest Serv, Eastern Reg Off, 626 E Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202 USA
关键词
American chestnut; Eastern deciduous forest; Hickories; Mesophication; Pines; Quercus; NORTH-AMERICA; FOREST ECOSYSTEMS; DYNAMICS; FIRE; CONSERVATION; TREES; QUERCUS; USA; RESTORATION; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.05.037
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Foundation tree species are dominant and define ecosystems. Because of the historical importance of oaks (Quercus) in east-central United States, it was unlikely that oak associates, such as pines (Pinus), hickories (Carya) and chestnut (Castanea), rose to this status. We used 46 historical tree studies or databases (ca. 1620-1900) covering 28 states, 1.7 million trees, and 50% of the area of the eastern United States to examine importance of oaks compared to pines, hickories, and chestnuts. Oak was the most abundant genus, ranging from 40% to 70% of total tree composition at the ecological province scale and generally increasing in dominance from east to west across this area. Pines, hickories, and chestnuts were co-dominant (ratio of oak composition to other genera of <2) in no more than five of 70 ecological subsections and two of 20 ecological sections in east-central United States, and thus by definition, were not foundational. Although other genera may be called foundational because of localized abundance or perceptions resulting from inherited viewpoints, they decline from consideration when compared to overwhelming oak abundance across this spatial extent. The open structure and high-light conditions of oak ecosystems uniquely supported species-rich understories. Loss of oak as a foundation genus has occurred with loss of open forest ecosystems at landscape scales. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abrams M. D., 1992, J TORREY BOT SOC, V42, P346, DOI DOI 10.2307/1311781
  • [2] Abrams MD, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P927, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0927:WHATWO]2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Implications of a predicted shift from upland oaks to red maple on forest hydrology and nutrient availability
    Alexander, Heather D.
    Arthur, Mary A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2010, 40 (04): : 716 - 726
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, OAK FOREST
  • [6] Refining the Oak-Fire Hypothesis for Management of Oak-Dominated Forests of the Eastern United States
    Arthur, Mary A.
    Alexander, Heather D.
    Dey, Daniel C.
    Schweitzer, Callie J.
    Loftis, David L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2012, 110 (05) : 257 - 266
  • [7] Barnes T. A., 1998, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, V22, P138
  • [8] BOERNER REJ, 1981, AM MIDL NAT, V105, P320
  • [9] Braun EL., 1950, Deciduous forests of eastern North America
  • [10] A STUDY OF 2 COMMUNITIES OF THE NEW-JERSEY PINE BARRENS AND A COMPARISON OF METHODS
    BUELL, MF
    CANTLON, JE
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1950, 31 (04) : 567 - 586