A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services

被引:80
作者
Legg, Lynn [1 ]
Gladman, John [2 ]
Drummond, Avril [2 ]
Davidson, Alex [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Biomed Engn, Glasgow G4 0NW, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[3] Joint Improvement Team, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Reablement; older people; personal care services; multimorbidity; disability; independence; systematic review; randomized controlled trial; non-randomized controlled trial; public policy; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; RESTORATIVE CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; INDEPENDENCE PROGRAM; PROTOCOL; ADULTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/0269215515603220
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether publically funded reablement services' have any effect on patient health or use of services. Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies in which reablement interventions were compared with no care or usual care in people referred to public-funded personal care services. Data sources included: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EPOC register of studies, trials registers, Medline, EMBASE, and CINHAL. Searches were from 2000 up to end February 2015. Setting: Not applicable. Participants: Investigators' definition of the target population for reablement interventions. Main outcome measures: Use of publically funded personal care services and dependence in personal activities of daily living. Results: We found no studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria that assessed the effectiveness of reablement interventions. We did note the lack of an agreed understanding of the nature of reablement. Conclusions: Reablement is an ill-defined intervention targeted towards an ill-defined and potentially highly heterogeneous population/patient group. There is no evidence to suggest it is effective at either of its goals; increasing personal independence or reducing use of personal care services.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 749
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review
    Backhouse, Tamara
    Kenkmann, Andrea
    Lane, Kathleen
    Penhale, Bridget
    Poland, Fiona
    Killett, Anne
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2016, 45 (03) : 337 - 345
  • [42] A scoping review of the evidence for community-based dementia palliative care services and their related service activities
    O'Connor, Niamh
    Fox, Siobhan
    Kernohan, W. George
    Drennan, Jonathan
    Guerin, Suzanne
    Murphy, Aileen
    Timmons, Suzanne
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [43] Effects on clients' daily functioning and common features of reablement interventions: a systematic literature review
    Buma, Lise E.
    Vluggen, Stan
    Zwakhalen, Sandra
    Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M.
    Metzelthin, Silke F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2022, 19 (04) : 903 - 929
  • [44] Models of home care services for persons with dementia: a narrative review
    Low, Lee-Fay
    Fletcher, Jennifer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 (10) : 1593 - 1600
  • [45] How older people enact care involvement during transition from hospital to home: A systematic review and model
    Murray, Jenni
    Hardicre, Natasha
    Birks, Yvonne
    O'Hara, Jane
    Lawton, Rebecca
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2019, 22 (05) : 883 - 893
  • [46] Health Care Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services for People With Disabilities A Systematic Review
    Buckley, David I.
    Hsu, Frances
    Dana, Tracy
    Blackie, Keeley
    Holmes, Rebecca
    Nygren, Peggy
    Horner-Johnson, Willi
    Nicolaidis, Christina
    Chou, Roger
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [47] Hospital admissions and place of death of residents of care homes receiving specialist healthcare services: Protocol for a systematic review
    Tucker, Sue
    Buck, Deborah
    Roe, Brenda
    Hughes, Jane
    Challis, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (02) : 443 - 451
  • [48] The evidence for services to avoid or delay residential aged care admission: a systematic review
    Julie A. Luker
    Anthea Worley
    Mandy Stanley
    Jeric Uy
    Amber M. Watt
    Susan L. Hillier
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 19
  • [49] The economic evidence for advance care planning: Systematic review of evidence
    Dixon, Josie
    Matosevic, Tihana
    Knapp, Martin
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 29 (10) : 869 - 884
  • [50] A systematic literature review of incontinence care for persons with dementia: the research evidence
    Hagglund, Doris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (3-4) : 303 - 312