Donor Government Ideology and Aid Bypass

被引:24
作者
Allen, Susan Hannah [1 ]
Flynn, Michael E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Dept Polit Sci, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Kansas State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
FOREIGN-AID; POLITICAL-PARTIES; MULTILATERAL AID; POLICY; ALLOCATION; LIBERALS; DELIVERY; IMPACT; STATE;
D O I
10.1093/fpa/orx005
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
How do domestic politics in the donor country affect foreign aid policy? Scholars have analyzed the impact that political parties and domestic institutions play in shaping aid effort. Building on this previous work, we examine the impact of domestic politics on the channels chosen for aid distribution. In this paper, we explore whether and how the ideological composition of donor governments affects the method of delivering aid to recipient states. Specifically, we argue that more liberal governments are more inclined to provide aid via nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), while more conservative governments prefer to give aid through direct bilateral government-to-government channels. These choices, we argue, reflect the different goals that right and left parties pursue through their allocation of foreign aid. Our results indicate that left governments are more inclined to channel aid through NGOs in an attempt to directly implement poverty alleviation strategies. Alternatively, right wing governments place a greater emphasis on channeling aid through recipient state governments to promote the economic interests of their constituents and the geopolitical interests of the state.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 468
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Corrupt governments do not receive more state-to-state aid: Governance and the delivery of foreign aid through non-state actors [J].
Acht, Martin ;
Mahmoud, Toman Omar ;
Thiele, Rainer .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2015, 114 :20-33
[2]   Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? [J].
Alesina, A ;
Dollar, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2000, 5 (01) :33-63
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORLD DEV IND 2014
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INT MILITARY ALLIANC
[5]  
Bebbington A., 1995, Journal of International Development, V7, P879, DOI 10.1002/jid.3380070607
[6]   Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction [J].
Berry, William D. ;
Golder, Matt ;
Milton, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (03) :653-671
[7]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[8]   Donor ideology and types of foreign aid [J].
Brech, Viktor ;
Potrafke, Niklas .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 (01) :61-75
[9]  
Budge Ian., 1992, PARTY POLICY GOVT CO
[10]   The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind [J].
Carney, Dana R. ;
Jost, John T. ;
Gosling, Samuel D. ;
Potter, Jeff .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) :807-840