Trading on Local Energy Markets: A Comparison of Market Designs and Bidding Strategies

被引:102
作者
Mengelkamp, Esther [1 ]
Staudt, Philipp [1 ]
Gaerttner, Johannes [1 ]
Weinhardt, Christof [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Informat Syst & Mkt, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
来源
2017 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET (EEM 17) | 2017年
关键词
Local energy markets; market design; agent behavior; ELECTRICITY MARKET; RENEWABLE ENERGY; STORAGE SYSTEMS; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1109/EEM.2017.7981938
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Increasing renewable energy sources and innovative information and communication systems open up new challenges and opportunities to integrate distributed generation into the energy supply system. Formerly centralized energy systems need to be adapted to take full advantage of the immense potential of decentralized energy generation and smart, interconnected energy end users. We introduce a local electricity market on which prosumers and consumers of a community are able to trade electricity directly amongst each other. This local electricity market supports the local integration of renewable energy generation. It facilitates a local balance of energy supply and demand and hence reduces the need for extensive electricity transmission. We introduce, evaluate and compare two local market designs, a direct peer-to-peer market and a closed order book market, as well as two agent behaviors, zero-intelligence agents and intelligently bidding agents. We derive four scenarios by combining each market design with each agent behavior, respectively. All market scenarios offer similar economic advantages for the market participants. However, the peer-to-peer market with intelligent agents appears to be the most advantageous as it results in the lowest average overall electricity price.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Distributed energy generation and sustainable development [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Saari, Arto .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2006, 10 (06) :539-558
[2]  
[Anonymous], POW EN SOC GEN M 201
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 5 INT C EL COMM RES
[4]   Economic optimal operation of Community Energy Storage systems in competitive energy markets [J].
Arghandeh, Reza ;
Woyak, Jeremy ;
Onen, Ahmet ;
Jung, Jaesung ;
Broadwater, Robert P. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 135 :71-80
[5]   Energy storage and its use with intermittent renewable energy [J].
Barton, JP ;
Infield, DG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2004, 19 (02) :441-448
[6]   Who benefits from an open limit-order book? [J].
Baruch, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2005, 78 (04) :1267-1306
[7]   Optimized Bidding of a EV Aggregation Agent in the Electricity Market [J].
Bessa, Ricardo J. ;
Matos, Manuel A. ;
Soares, Filipe Joel ;
Pecas Lopes, Joao A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2012, 3 (01) :443-452
[8]  
Block C., 2008, P 41 ANN HAW INT C S, DOI [10.1109/hicss.2008.27, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2008.27]
[9]   Decentralized market with common values uncertainty: Non-steady states [J].
Blouin, MR ;
Serrano, R .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (02) :323-346
[10]  
Bower J, 2000, ENERGY J, V21, P1