Optimisation of Varian TrueBeam head, thorax and pelvis CBCT based on patient size

被引:5
作者
Agnew, Christina E. [1 ]
McCallum, Candice [1 ]
Johnston, Gail [2 ]
Workman, Adam [2 ]
Irvine, Denise M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Ireland Canc Ctr, Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Radiotherapy Phys, Belfast BT9 7AB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Forster Green Hosp, Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Radiat Protect & Radiol Sci & Imaging, Belfast BT8 6GR, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
CBCT; dose optimisation; radiotherapy imaging; CONE-BEAM CT; IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; QUALITY; ORGAN; SELECTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396920000618
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to optimise patient dose and image quality of Varian TrueBeam cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) pelvis, thorax and head and neck (H&N) images based on patient size. Methods: An elliptical phantom of small, medium and large size was designed representative of a local population of pelvis, thorax and H&N patients. The phantom was used to establish the relationship between image noise, CT and CBCT exposure settings. Using this insight, clinical images were optimised in phases and the image quality graded qualitatively by radiographers. At each phase, the time required to match the images was recorded from the record and verify system. Results: Average patient diameter was a suitable metric to categorise patient size. Phantom measurements showed the power relationship between noise and CBCT exposure settings of value -0 center dot 15, -0 center dot 35 and -0 center dot 43 for thorax, pelvis and H&N, respectively. These quantitative phantom measurements provided confidence that phased variation of similar to +/- 20% in mAs should result in clinically usable images. Qualitative assessment of almost 2000 images reduced the exposure settings in H&N images by -50%, thorax images by up to -66% and pelvis images by up to -80%. These optimised CBCT settings did not affect the time required to match images. Findings: Varian TrueBeam CBCT mAs settings have been optimised for dose and image quality based on patient size for three treatment sites: pelvis, thorax and H&N. Quantitative phantom measurements provided insight into the magnitude of change to implement clinically. The final optimised exposure settings were determined from radiographer qualitative image assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 256
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2018
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ICRP Publication 103, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ICRP.2007.10.003
[3]   Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with cone beam CT: dosimetric effects of imaging frequency and PTV margin [J].
Ariyaratne, Hemal ;
Chesham, Hayley ;
Pettingell, John ;
Alonzi, Roberto .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 121 (01) :103-108
[4]  
Bernstein D., 2015, IPEM C XRAY IM RAD B
[5]  
British Institute of Radiology, 2015, C P TECHN US ON TREA
[6]   Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review [J].
Davis, Anne T. ;
Palmer, Antony L. ;
Nisbet, Andrew .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1076)
[7]   Image-guided radiotherapy: rationale, benefits, and limitations [J].
Dawson, Laura A. ;
Sharpe, Michael B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (10) :848-858
[8]   Radiation exposure to patients from image guidance procedures and techniques to reduce the imaging dose [J].
Ding, George X. ;
Munro, Peter .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 108 (01) :91-98
[9]   Reducing radiation exposure to patients from kV-CBCT imaging [J].
Ding, George X. ;
Munro, Peter ;
Pawlowski, Jason ;
Malcolm, Arnold ;
Coffey, Charles W. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (03) :585-592
[10]   Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT [J].
Huda, W ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Levin, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) :430-435