Digital indirect detection x-ray imagers with microlens focusing: Effects of Fresnel reflections from the microlens layer

被引:1
作者
Petrick, N [1 ]
Badano, A [1 ]
Chan, HP [1 ]
Sahiner, B [1 ]
Hadjiiski, LM [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Rockville, MD 20904 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2003年 / 5030卷
关键词
digital x-ray imaging; digital radiography; microlen array; indirect detection imaging; light collection; fill factor; flat-panel imager;
D O I
10.1117/12.479995
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We have been investigating whether a microlens layer placed between the phosphor and the photodetector can improve indirect detection x-ray imagers. Using a simulation study, we analyzed the light collection properties of the proposed imager taking into account Fresnel reflection and transmission properties of the lenses and the screen. A digital x-ray imager combining an 82-mum-thick Gd2O2S:Tb phosphor screen, a fused silica microlens layer, and a 127-mum pixel pitch photodetector (optical fill factor of 57%) were modeled. The light collection for. the prototypes varied from 53% to 69% for lens thicknesses ranging from 10 to 56 mum. The full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the light spread function ranged from 177-192 mum. 4-8% of the light was reflected back into the phosphor screen when correctly taking into account Fresnel reflections for these prototype imagers. In comparison, 56% of the light was collected and the FWHM of the light spread function was 174 mum for a conventional imager with the screen in direct contact with the photodetector. We observed that the light collection was overestimated by 6-9% but the spread functions were basically unaffected when the Fresnel assumption was not utilized in the simulations.. This study shows that a properly designed microlens layer can more than offset Fresnel losses, thereby producing an improved digital x-ray imager.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 510
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   A large-area, 97 μm pitch, indirect-detection, active matrix, flat-panel imager (AMFPI) [J].
Antonuk, LE ;
El-Mohri, Y ;
Hall, A ;
Jee, KW ;
Maolinbay, M ;
Nassif, SC ;
Rong, XJ ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
Zhao, QH ;
Weisfield, RL .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 3336 :2-13
[2]  
ANTONUK LE, 1997, P SPIE MED IMG, V3032, P3
[3]  
Bass M, 1995, HDB OPTICS DEVICES M
[4]   RADIOLOGICAL IMAGING - 2000 AD [J].
CAPP, MP .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (03) :541-550
[5]  
Hecht E., 1987, OPTICS
[6]   Evaluation of direct-detection and indirect-detection active matrix, flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for digital mammography [J].
Jee, KW ;
Antonuk, LE ;
El-Mohri, Y ;
Maolinbay, M ;
Zhao, QH .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 4320 :13-23
[7]   ANALYSIS OF SIGNAL PROPAGATION IN OPTICALLY COUPLED DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY .1. PHOSPHOR SCREENS [J].
MAIDMENT, ADA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (05) :877-889
[8]   Charge collection and capacitance in continuous film flat panel detectors [J].
Mulato, M ;
Lemmi, F ;
Lau, R ;
Lu, JP ;
Ho, J ;
Ready, SE ;
Rahn, JT ;
Street, RA .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 3977 :26-37
[9]   Digital mammographic imaging using microlens focusing: Estimation of light collection and X-ray utilization [J].
Petrick, N ;
Chan, HP ;
Goodsitt, MM ;
Sahiner, B ;
Hadjiiski, L .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 :276-284
[10]   A technique to improve the effective fill factor of digital mammographic imagers [J].
Petrick, N ;
Keshavmurthy, S ;
Chan, HP ;
Goodsitt, MM ;
Sahiner, B .
PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 3336 :210-218