The magnitude of the problem of obstetric violence and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study

被引:60
作者
Martinez-Galiano, Juan Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Vazquez, Sergio [1 ]
Rodriguez-Almagro, Julian [3 ]
Hernandez-Martinez, Antonio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Dept Nursing, Campus Lagunillas S-N,Bldg B3 Off 266, Jaen 23071, Spain
[2] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Nursing Ciudad Real, Dept Nursing, Ciudad Real, Spain
关键词
Obstetric violence; Birth; Woman; Pregnancy; Human rights; WOMEN; CHILDBIRTH; ABUSE; DISRESPECT; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: In recent years, the concept of obstetric violence has become visible among women and professionals, but its prevalence and the factors with which it is related in our healthcare environment are unknown. Aim: To determine the prevalence of obstetric violence in the Spanish healthcare system and identify the associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted during 2019 and included 899 women who had given birth in the last 12 months. An online questionnaire was distributed through midwives and women associations in Spain. The questionnaire included sociodemographic, clinical, and assistance practices variables. The primary outcome variable was obstetric violence and its verbal, physical, and psycho-affective types. Crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (ORa) were estimated using binary logistic regression. Results: Obstetric violence was reported by 67.4% (606) of the women; 25.1% (226) verbal, 54.5% (490) physical, and 36.7% (330) psycho-affective. Overall obstetric violence was observed more frequently in women who attended maternal education programme (ORa 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.32), those who presented a birth plan but it was not respected (ORa 2.82, 95% CI 1.27-6.29), those who received regional analgesia (ORa 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.30), those who required an urgent caesarean section (ORa 3.46, 95% CI 1.79-6.69), underwent an episiotomy (ORa 3.34, 95% CI 2.21-5.38), and whose newborn was admitted to an intensive care unit (ORa 2.73, 95% Cl: 1.21-6.15). The presentation of a birth plan was observed as protective factors, and the possibility of skin-to-skin (ORa 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.62) and felt respected (ORa 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85). Conclusions: Two out of three women perceive having suffered obstetric violence during childbirth. Practices such as skin-to-skin contact, and the use of respected birth plans, were protective factors against obstetric violence. (C) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E526 / E536
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adrian P., 2017, MUSAS REV INVESTIG M, V2, P56
[2]  
Araujo-Cuauro J.C., 2019, Rev. Mex. Med. Forense, V4, P1
[3]   Is there respectful maternity care in Poland? Women's views about care during labor and birth [J].
Baranowska, Barbara ;
Doroszewska, Antonina ;
Kubicka-Kraszynska, Urszula ;
Pietrusiewicz, Joanna ;
Adamska-Sala, Iwona ;
Kajdy, Anna ;
Sys, Dorota ;
Tataj-Puzyna, Urszula ;
Baczek, Grazyna ;
Crowther, Susan .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (01)
[4]   Obstetric violence in the daily routine of care and its characteristics [J].
Barbosa Jardim, Danubia Mariane ;
Modena, Celina Maria .
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 26
[5]   How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys [J].
Bohren, Meghan A. ;
Mehrtash, Hedieh ;
Fawole, Bukola ;
Maung, Thae Maung ;
Balde, Mamadou Dioulde ;
Maya, Ernest ;
Thwin, Soe Soe ;
Aderoba, Adeniyi K. ;
Vogel, Joshua P. ;
Irinyenikan, Theresa Azonima ;
Adeyanju, A. Olusoji ;
Mon, Nwe Oo ;
Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame ;
Landoulsi, Sihem ;
Guure, Chris ;
Adanu, Richard ;
Diallo, Boubacar Alpha ;
Gulmezoglu, A. Metin ;
Soumah, Anne-Marie ;
Sall, Alpha Oumar ;
Tuncalp, Ozge .
LANCET, 2019, 394 (10210) :1750-1763
[6]  
Brigidi S, 2018, OBS VIOLENCIA OBS ES, V43, P42
[7]   Obstetric violence criminalised in Mexico: a comparative analysis of hospital complaints filed with the Medical Arbitration Commission [J].
Calvo Aguilar, Omar ;
Torres Falcon, Marta ;
Valdez Santiago, Rosario .
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 46 (01) :38-45
[8]  
Camacaro M, 2015, UTOP PRAX LATINOAM, V20, P113
[9]  
Cecilia M.M., 2019, LUX MED, P27
[10]  
Corral-Manzano G.M., 2019, MUSAS, V4, P100, DOI [10.1344/musas2019.vol4.num2.6, DOI 10.1344/MUSAS2019.VOL4.NUM2.6]