Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry in post-LASIK eyes for myopia

被引:12
|
作者
Al-Mezaine, Hani S. [1 ]
Al-Amro, Saleh A. [1 ]
Kangave, Dustan [2 ]
Al-Obeidan, Saleh [1 ]
Al-Jubair, Khaled M. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Riyadh 11321, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Res Dept, Riyadh 11321, Saudi Arabia
[3] Natl Guard Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Corneal thickness; Laser in situ keratomileusis; Pachymetry; Pentacam; Ultrasound; NONCONTACT SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; ANTERIOR-CHAMBER DEPTH; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; ORBSCAN-II; SCHEIMPFLUG PHOTOGRAPHY; OCULUS PENTACAM; REPEATABILITY; PACHOMETRY; OXYBUPROCAINE;
D O I
10.1177/112067211002000507
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained using the Pentacam Scheimpflug system with those obtained using DGH ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes for myopia. METHODS. In a prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 143 eyes of 72 post-LASIK patients using both the Pentacam and UP at the Eye Consultants Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. RESULTS. The mean CCT was 522+/-42.2 mu m with the Oculus Pentacam and 516.2+/-40.6 mu m with UP. The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean +/-SD for the differences between the 2 devices was 5.8+/-13.6 mu m, with 95% confidence interval limits ranging from -20.9 mu m to 32.6 mu m. A test of statistical significance indicated that the mean differences of 5.8+/-13.6 mu m differed significantly from zero (p<0.001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test), thus indicating that the Pentacam measurements tended to overestimate CCT compared with UP. Analysis of regression showed a high correlation between the values obtained with both devices (r=0.947, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS. In post-LASIK myopic eyes, although a high correlation has been shown between Pentacam and UP measurements, Pentacam tends to overestimate CCT compared to UP. Pentacam probably cannot be used interchangeably with UP in post-LASIK eyes for myopia. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2010; 20: 852-7)
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 857
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II scanning slit topography, noncontact specular microscopy, and ultrasonic pachymetry in eyes with keratoconus
    Kawana, K
    Miyata, K
    Tokunaga, T
    Kiuchi, T
    Hiraoka, T
    Oshika, T
    CORNEA, 2005, 24 (08) : 967 - 971
  • [22] Measurement of central corneal thickness using Orbscan 3, Pentacam HR and ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes
    Hesham Mohamed Gharieb
    Doaa Maamoun Ashour
    Mohamed Ibrahim Saleh
    Ihab Saad Othman
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 1759 - 1764
  • [23] Comparison of Oculus Pentacam and Stratus Optical Coherence Tomography for Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness
    Ceylan, Osman Melih
    Turk, Adem
    Erdurman, Cuneyt
    Mumcuoglu, Tarkan
    Erdem, Uzeyir
    Gokce, Gokcen
    Dagli, Selim
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (06) : 670 - 674
  • [24] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry
    Ladi, Jeevan S.
    Shah, Nitant A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 58 (05) : 385 - 388
  • [25] Central corneal thickness measurements after myopic photorefractive keratectomy using Scheimpflug imaging, scanning-slit topography, and ultrasonic pachymetry
    Faramarzi, Amir
    Karimian, Farid
    Jafarinasab, Mohammad Reza
    Bonyadi, Mohammad Hossein Jabbarpoor
    Yaseri, Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (09) : 1543 - 1549
  • [26] Comparison of corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam, the PARK1 and an ultrasonic pachymeter
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
    Mehravaran, Shiva
    Rezvan, Farhad
    Bigdeli, Sara
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2011, 94 (05) : 433 - 437
  • [27] Repeatability of Central Corneal Thickness Measures by Orbscan Pachymetry for Right and Left Eyes
    Jonuscheit, Sven
    Doughty, Michael J.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 35 (01): : 20 - 25
  • [28] Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Thinnest Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Simulated Keratometry Using Galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius Devices
    Anayol, Mustafa A.
    Guler, Emre
    Yagci, Ramazan
    Sekeroglu, Mehmet A.
    Yilmazoglu, Meltem
    Tirhis, Hakan
    Kulak, Ali E.
    Yilmazbas, Pelin
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (06) : 582 - 586
  • [29] Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry
    Can, Ertugrul
    Eser-Ozturk, Hilal
    Duran, Mustafa
    Cetinkaya, Tugba
    Ariturk, Nursen
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 67 (04) : 496 - 499
  • [30] A Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured using Noncontact Methods and Ultrasonic Pachymetry
    Toptan, M.
    Simsek, A.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 24 (10) : 1506 - 1510