DNA binding domain-independent pathways are involved in EWS/FLI1-mediated oncogenesis

被引:51
作者
Welford, SM
Hebert, SP
Deneen, B
Arvand, A
Denny, CT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Mol Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pediat, Gwynne Hazen Cherry Mem Labs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Expt Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M106757200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Specific chromosomal translocations involving the ews gene and one of five members of the ets family of transcription factors create ews/ets fusion genes that are found in similar to 85% of Ewing's family of tumors. ews/ets fusion genes consistently maintain an intact and functional ets DNA binding domain (DBD) in all of these cases. We demonstrate here, however, that EWS/FLI1, the most prevalent EWS/ETS fusion, activates oncogenic pathways independent of its DBD. In in vivo tumor assays, EWS/FLI1 molecules with either point mutations or a large deletion in the ets DBD retain the ability to accelerate tumors in NIH 3T3 cells, whereas they lose the ability to bind DNA in vitro. Additionally, whereas inhibition of DBD functions of EWS/FLI1 with a dominant negative form of FLI1 is sufficient to inhibit anchorage-independent growth in NIH 3T3 cells, it is ineffective in inhibiting tumor growth in SCID mice. Usage of this dominant negative construct in a Ewing's tumor cell line, however, does reduce the rate of tumor formation, supporting the need for a functional DBD in this context. Together, these results suggest that EWS/FLI1 induces both DBD-dependent and DBD-independent oncogenic pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:41977 / 41984
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Arvand A, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P5311
[2]  
ARVAND A, 2001, IN PRESS ONCOGENE
[3]   hTAF(II)68, a novel RNA/ssDNA-binding protein with homology to the pro-oncoproteins TLS/FUS and EWS is associated with both TFIID and RNA polymerase II [J].
Bertolotti, A ;
Lutz, Y ;
Heard, DJ ;
Chambon, P ;
Tora, L .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1996, 15 (18) :5022-5031
[4]  
BRAUN BS, 1995, MOL CELL BIOL, V15, P4623
[5]  
Chansky HA, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P3586
[6]   Transforming activity of EWS/FLI is not strictly dependent upon DNA-binding activity [J].
Jaishankar, S ;
Zhang, J ;
Roussel, MF ;
Baker, SJ .
ONCOGENE, 1999, 18 (40) :5592-5597
[7]   Molecular genetics of chromosome translocations involving EWS and related family members [J].
Kim, J ;
Pelletier, J .
PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS, 1999, 1 (03) :127-138
[8]   The splicing factor U1C represses EWS/FLI-mediated transactivation [J].
Knoop, LL ;
Baker, SJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (32) :24865-24871
[9]   EWS/FLI alters 5′-splice site selection [J].
Knoop, LL ;
Baker, SJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 276 (25) :22317-22322
[10]  
Kovar H, 1996, CELL GROWTH DIFFER, V7, P429