The interaction of central command and the exercise pressor reflex in mediating baroreflex resetting during exercise in humans

被引:53
作者
Gallagher, KM
Fadel, PJ
Smith, SA
Stromstad, M
Ide, K
Secher, NH
Raven, PB
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Care Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Phys Therapy, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Muscle Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ N Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Integrat Physiol, Ft Worth, TX 76107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1113/expphysiol.2005.032110
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Central command and the exercise pressor reflex can independently reset the carotid baroreflex (CBR) during exercise. The present investigation assessed the interactive relationship between these two neural mechanisms in mediating baroreflex resetting during exercise. Six men performed static leg exercise at 20% maximal voluntary contraction under four conditions: control, no perturbation; neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by administration of the neuromuscular blocking agent Norcuron (central command activation); MAST, application of medical antishock trousers inflated to 100 mmHg (exercise pressor reflex activation); and Combo, NMB plus MAST (concomitant central command and exercise pressor reflex activation). With regard to CBR control of heart rate (HR), both NMB and Combo conditions resulted in a further resetting of the carotid-cardiac stimulus-response curve compared to control conditions, suggesting that CBR-HR resetting is predominately mediated by central command. In contrast, it appears that CBR control of blood pressure can be mediated by signals from either central command or the exercise pressor reflex, since both NMB and MAST conditions equally augmented the resetting of the carotid-vasomotor stimulus-response curve. With regard to the regulation of both HR and blood pressure, the extent of CBR resetting was greater during the Combo condition than during overactivation of either central command or the exercise pressor reflex alone. Therefore, we suggest that central command and the exercise pressor reflex interact such that signals from one input facilitate signals from the other, resulting in an enhanced resetting of the baroreflex during exercise.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[2]   ASSESSMENT OF THRESHOLD AND SATURATION PRESSURE IN THE BAROREFLEX FUNCTION CURVE - A NEW MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
CHEN, HI ;
CHANG, KC .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 41 (06) :861-877
[3]   BARORECEPTOR REFLEX AND CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES ASSOCIATED WITH SUSTAINED MUSCULAR-CONTRACTION IN CAT [J].
COOTE, JH ;
DODDS, WN .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 363 (02) :167-173
[4]   EXPRESSION OF C-FOS PROTEIN IN THE NUCLEUS-TRACTUS-SOLITARIUS IN RESPONSE TO PHYSIOLOGICAL ACTIVATION OF CAROTID BARORECEPTORS [J].
DEAN, C ;
SEAGARD, JL .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 69 (01) :249-257
[5]   BAROREFLEX RESPONSIVENESS IS MAINTAINED DURING ISOMETRIC-EXERCISE IN HUMANS [J].
EBERT, TJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 61 (02) :797-803
[6]  
ECKBERG DL, 1975, J LAB CLIN MED, V85, P167
[7]   Recent insights into carotid baroreflex function in humans using the variable pressure neck chamber [J].
Fadel, PJ ;
Ogoh, S ;
Keller, DM ;
Raven, PB .
EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 88 (06) :671-680
[8]  
FADEL PJ, 2004, RECENT RES DEV PHYSL, V2, P413
[9]   Effects of partial neuromuscular blockade on carotid baroreflex function during exercise in humans [J].
Gallagher, KM ;
Fadel, PJ ;
Stromstad, M ;
Ide, K ;
Smith, SA ;
Querry, RG ;
Raven, PB ;
Secher, NH .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2001, 533 (03) :861-870
[10]   Effects of exercise pressor reflex activation on carotid baroreflex function during exercise in humans [J].
Gallagher, KM ;
F'adel, PJ ;
Stromstad, M ;
Ide, K ;
Smith, SA ;
Querry, RG ;
Raven, PB ;
Secher, NH .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2001, 533 (03) :871-880