How Do Individual Politicians Affect Privatization? Evidence from China

被引:14
作者
Ru, Hong [1 ]
Zou, Kunru [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Renmin Univ China, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Patronage connection; Privatization; Corruption; China; GOVERNMENT-OWNED BANKS; CORRUPTION; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; PATRONAGE; STATE; WORK; PRODUCTIVITY; CONNECTIONS; FAVORITISM;
D O I
10.1093/rof/rfab030
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the role of local politicians' patronage connections to top political leaders (i.e., the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) in privatization outcomes. We find that connected local politicians are more likely to sell state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to corrupt buyers at substantially discounted prices. The SOEs purchased by corrupt buyers engage in significantly more fraudulent and corrupt activities following privatization and thus perform worse. For identification, we use the mandatory retirement ages of Central Committee members in a fuzzy regression discontinuity design. When local politicians lose their connections because Central Committee members step down after reaching mandatory retirement ages, we find a 14.4 percentage point drop in the likelihood of choosing corrupt buyers and a 90.13% drop in price discounts for privatization sales. Consequently, the privatized SOEs experience jumps in efficiency gains after the age cut-offs for mandatory retirement.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 672
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   How Do Politicians Capture a State? Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises [J].
Szarzec, Katarzyna ;
Totleben, Bartosz ;
Piatek, Dawid .
EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES, 2022, 36 (01) :141-172
[2]   How does privatization affect cash dividends? Quasi-experimental evidence from China [J].
Hu, Jinshuai ;
Jiang, Haiyan ;
Wu, Yibing .
EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 57
[3]   Corruption and privatization: Evidence from a natural experiment in China [J].
Zhu, Ling ;
Kong, Dongmin .
ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2023, 31 (01) :217-239
[4]   Do criminally accused politicians affect economic outcomes? Evidence from India [J].
Prakash, Nishith ;
Rockmore, Marc ;
Uppal, Yogesh .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2019, 141
[5]   What Causes Privatization? Evidence from Import Competition in China [J].
Hu, Qing ;
Li, Wenjing ;
Lin, Chen ;
Wei, Lai .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (05) :3080-3101
[6]   How does privatization work in China? [J].
Bai, Chong-En ;
Lu, Jiangyong ;
Tao, Zhigang .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2009, 37 (03) :453-470
[7]   Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China [J].
Hu, Juncheng .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 68
[8]   Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China [J].
Khan, Farman Ullah ;
Zhang, Junrui ;
Dong, Nanyan ;
Usman, Muhammad ;
Ullah, Sajid ;
Ali, Shahid .
EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 11 (03) :497-515
[9]   Do the illegal and legal rents of politicians affect municipal election outcomes? Empirical evidence [J].
Benito, Bernardino ;
Guillamon, Maria-Dolores ;
Rios, Ana-Maria ;
Bastida, Francisco .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2019, 45 (04) :546-568
[10]   Do Criminal Politicians Affect Firm Investment and Value? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach [J].
Nanda, Vikram ;
Pareek, Ankur .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2025, 198 (03) :579-614