How Do Individual Politicians Affect Privatization? Evidence from China

被引:8
|
作者
Ru, Hong [1 ]
Zou, Kunru [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Renmin Univ China, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Patronage connection; Privatization; Corruption; China; GOVERNMENT-OWNED BANKS; CORRUPTION; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; PATRONAGE; STATE; WORK; PRODUCTIVITY; CONNECTIONS; FAVORITISM;
D O I
10.1093/rof/rfab030
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the role of local politicians' patronage connections to top political leaders (i.e., the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) in privatization outcomes. We find that connected local politicians are more likely to sell state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to corrupt buyers at substantially discounted prices. The SOEs purchased by corrupt buyers engage in significantly more fraudulent and corrupt activities following privatization and thus perform worse. For identification, we use the mandatory retirement ages of Central Committee members in a fuzzy regression discontinuity design. When local politicians lose their connections because Central Committee members step down after reaching mandatory retirement ages, we find a 14.4 percentage point drop in the likelihood of choosing corrupt buyers and a 90.13% drop in price discounts for privatization sales. Consequently, the privatized SOEs experience jumps in efficiency gains after the age cut-offs for mandatory retirement.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 672
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How Do Politicians Capture a State? Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises
    Szarzec, Katarzyna
    Totleben, Bartosz
    Piatek, Dawid
    EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES, 2022, 36 (01) : 141 - 172
  • [2] How does privatization affect cash dividends? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Hu, Jinshuai
    Jiang, Haiyan
    Wu, Yibing
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 57
  • [3] Corruption and privatization: Evidence from a natural experiment in China
    Zhu, Ling
    Kong, Dongmin
    ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 2023, 31 (01) : 217 - 239
  • [4] Do criminally accused politicians affect economic outcomes? Evidence from India
    Prakash, Nishith
    Rockmore, Marc
    Uppal, Yogesh
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2019, 141
  • [5] What Causes Privatization? Evidence from Import Competition in China
    Hu, Qing
    Li, Wenjing
    Lin, Chen
    Wei, Lai
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (05) : 3080 - 3101
  • [6] How does privatization work in China?
    Bai, Chong-En
    Lu, Jiangyong
    Tao, Zhigang
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2009, 37 (03) : 453 - 470
  • [7] Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China
    Hu, Juncheng
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 68
  • [8] Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    Zhang, Junrui
    Dong, Nanyan
    Usman, Muhammad
    Ullah, Sajid
    Ali, Shahid
    EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 11 (03) : 497 - 515
  • [9] Do the illegal and legal rents of politicians affect municipal election outcomes? Empirical evidence
    Benito, Bernardino
    Guillamon, Maria-Dolores
    Rios, Ana-Maria
    Bastida, Francisco
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2019, 45 (04) : 546 - 568
  • [10] Do Criminal Politicians Affect Firm Investment and Value? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach
    Nanda, Vikram
    Pareek, Ankur
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2024,