Analysis of supply chain risks by structural equation model and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

被引:2
作者
Oturakci, Murat [1 ]
Yildirim, Rabia Sultan [1 ]
机构
[1] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, Adana, Turkey
来源
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2022年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Supply chain risks; Structural equation model; Fuzzy; Analytical hierarchy process; Pareto analysis; PROCESS AHP; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5505/pajes.2021.34119
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Supply chain risk management activities attempt to eliminate or minimize the effects of risks that businesses face or may encounter within the scope of supply chain activities. The main aim of this study is to define, decide, and prioritize the supply chain risk factors. In the content of the study, first, supply chain risks from the literature were gathered and then the obtained risks were grouped and combined and a summary risk table to be considered in the study was created. Second, a questionnaire was created to evaluate the risks in the created risk table, and evaluations were received from 391 users. According to the collected results, the main risks were evaluated statistically with the help of the Structural Equation Model (SEM), and then sub-risks were prioritized by the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method according to the model results. With the help of obtained results, action plan suggestions were developed for individuals and/or businesses in the supply chain over prioritized risks. Pareto Analysis was used to determine which of the sub-risks hosted by the main risks and the sub-risks will be included in the action plan. According to the results of the study, supply and demand risks are obtained as the most important main risks; procurement cost; frequency of material design changes, inaccurate demand forecasts, risks arising from supplier, risks arising from the costumer, transit time variability risks are identified as the most important sub-risks in the action plan.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[2]   Effectiveness of dynamic pricing strategy in presence of supply chain disruptions [J].
Avci, Mualla Gonca .
PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 26 (04) :789-798
[3]  
Ayhan M. B., 2013, International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, V4, P11, DOI [DOI 10.5121/IJMVSC.2013.4302, 10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302, 10.48550/arxiv.1311.2886]
[4]  
Bailey K., 2008, Methods of social research
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]  
Buckley J J., 1987, Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making, P389, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_31, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_31]
[7]  
Chhabile SB, 2012, INT J SCI J ENG RES, V3, P1910
[8]  
Chopra S, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V46, P53
[9]  
Dalalah D, 2010, JORDAN J MECH IND EN, V4, P567
[10]   Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† [J].
Dolgui, Alexandre ;
Ivanov, Dmitry ;
Rozhkov, Maxim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (05) :1285-1301