What Food waste solutions do people support?

被引:23
作者
Fan, Linlin [1 ]
Ellison, Brenna [2 ]
Wilson, Norbert L. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Sociol & Educ, 208A Armsby Bldg,Univ Pk, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN USA
[3] Duke Univ, Div Sch, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Food waste; Public support; Effectiveness; Date labels; Food donations; Package size; DATE LABELS; POLICY; ATTRIBUTIONS; PREVENTION; IMPACTS; VOTE; SELF;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the U.S., the estimated food waste at the household level is 32% of purchased food, translating to $240 billion in economic losses. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency set the first-ever national food waste reduction goal of a 50-percent reduction by 2030. Under this policy environment, this study assesses public support for nine food waste solutions: changes in food packaging, changes in portion sizes, standardization of date labeling terms, selling imperfect produce in retail stores, making donations easier, using uneaten food to feed animals, implementing composting in communities, consumer education campaigns on food waste, and taxing food waste. An online survey was sent to a nationally representative sample of U.S. respondents that asked about support for and perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. This study finds that making donations easier and the standardization of date labels were the most supported food waste solutions. Different food waste solutions appealed to different demographics of people based on their personal food waste experiences. Results are similar for the perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. Nevertheless, the percentage of respondents that considered each food waste solution to be effective was almost always less than the share of respondents who supported the solution. Thus, it is important to be cautious about this divergence when assessing public opinion on potential solutions, which may be enacted as policies designed to mitigate food waste.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Key characteristics and success factors of supply chain initiatives tackling consumer-related food waste - A multiple case study [J].
Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica ;
de Hooge, Ilona E. ;
Rohm, Harald ;
Normann, Anne ;
Bossle, Marilia Bonzanini ;
Gronhoj, Alice ;
Oostindjer, Marije .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 155 :33-45
[2]   Attributions for the performance of self and other: It matters who the "other" is [J].
Ashkanasy, NM .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 49 (01) :14-20
[3]   On the Measurement of Food Waste [J].
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Cakir, Metin ;
Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa ;
Novak, Lindsey ;
Rudi, Jeta .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 99 (05) :1148-1158
[4]  
Bovay J., 2013, AAEA ANN M WASH DC 4
[5]   A theory-based evaluation of food waste policy: Evidence from Italy [J].
Busetti, Simone .
FOOD POLICY, 2019, 88
[6]   Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States [J].
Buzby, Jean C. ;
Hyman, Jeffrey .
FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (05) :561-570
[7]   The Value of Retail- and Consumer-Level Fruit and Vegetable Losses in the United States [J].
Buzby, Jean C. ;
Hyman, Jeffrey ;
Stewart, Hayden ;
Wells, Hodan F. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2011, 45 (03) :492-515
[8]  
Choi C., 2019, Ugly produce" trend may have limits
[9]   Household waste prevention - a review of evidence [J].
Cox, Jayne ;
Giorgi, Sara ;
Sharp, Veronica ;
Strange, Kit ;
Wilson, David C. ;
Blakey, Nick .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2010, 28 (03) :193-219
[10]   Exploring the Drivers behind Self-Reported and Measured Food Wastage [J].
Elimelech, Efrat ;
Ert, Eyal ;
Ayalon, Ofira .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)