Historical Sociology's Puzzle of the Missing Transitions: A Case Study of Early Modern Japan

被引:3
作者
Cohen, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sociol, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
comparative; historical sociology; Japan; political sociology; economy; STATE FORMATION; ELITE CONFLICT; CAPITALISM; ENGLAND; ECONOMY; ORIGINS; DECLINE; GROWTH; CHINA; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0003122415583487
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Prominent accounts of the transition to capitalism have a far too limited understanding of pre-capitalist agrarian economies' potential for dynamism. Recent research shows that conditions earlier accounts identify as triggers for a transition to capitalism could be present without a transition occurring. I expand on implications of these cases of missing transitions for theorizing the dynamics of pre-capitalist agrarian economies. I present a theoretical framework that shows how phenomena previously associated with the transition to capitalismsuch as flexible property rights in land and labor, extensive markets, and accumulation of industrial and mercantile wealthemerged in pre-capitalist societies without leading to capitalist development. I illustrate the analytic upshot of this framework by considering the case study of Japan in the Tokugawa era (1603 to 1868). For historical sociologists, early modern Japan has long been seen as an anomalous case, puzzlingly mixing developments thought to represent early signs of capitalism with evidence of the durable survival of the feudal social order. In light of a more accurate account of the forces for and limits of dynamism in pre-capitalist agrarian economies, Tokugawa-era Japan is no longer a puzzling anomaly.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 625
页数:23
相关论文
共 104 条
[31]  
Goldstone Jack A., 1991, REVOLUTION REBELLION
[32]  
Grace Kwon, 2002, STATE FORMATION PROP
[33]  
Hall John A., 1986, POWERS LIBERTIES CAU
[34]  
Hall JohnW., 1991, The Cambridge History of Japan, V4, P128, DOI DOI 10.1017/CHOL9780521223553.005
[35]  
Hanley Susan B, 1977, EC DEMOGRAPHIC CHANG
[36]  
Harold Bolitho, 1974, TREASURES MEN FUDAI
[37]  
Hauser William B, 1974, EC I CHANGE TOKUGAWA
[38]  
Hayami A., 2004, EC HIST JAPAN 1600 1, V1, p[The, 1600]
[39]  
Hopcroft RosemaryL., 2000, Journal of European Economic History, V29, P5
[40]   PROTO-INDUSTRIAL ORIGINS OF JAPANESE CAPITALISM [J].
HOWELL, DL .
JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES, 1992, 51 (02) :269-286