State preparation error tolerant quantum key distribution protocol based on heralded single photon source

被引:2
作者
Ma Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Sun Ming-Shuo [1 ,2 ]
Liu Jing-Yang [1 ,2 ]
Ding Hua-Jian [1 ,2 ]
Wang Qin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Inst Quantum Informat & Technol, Nanjing 210003, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Minist Educ, Key Lab Broadband Wireless Commun & Sensor Networ, Nanjing 210003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
quantum key distribution; heralded single photon source; loss tolerant protocol; state preparation errors; UNCONDITIONAL SECURITY; PAIRS;
D O I
10.7498/aps.71.20211456
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In practical quantum key distribution systems, there inevitably exist errors in the quantum state preparation process due to imperfections in realistic equipment and devices. Those errors would lead to some security loopholes in the quantum key distribution systems. According to the work of Tamaki et al. (Phys. Rev. A 90 052314), here in this work we propose a state preparation error tolerant quantum key distribution protocol through using heralded single-photon sources. In this protocol, we characterize the size of the error in the preparation state of Alice and bring it into the security analysis, thereby avoiding possible security loopholes and improving the security of the system. Moreover, we take the three-intensity decoy-state method for example to introduce the method of constructing the model and estimating the parameters, and carry out corresponding numerical simulations. We make a comparison between the loss tolerant protocol with weak coherent source (WCS) and our present protocol using heralded single-photon source (HSPS). Simulation results show that under the same state preparation error, the key generation rate of the protocol based on WCS is higher than that of protocol based on HSPS at short transmission distances (e.g. less than 150 km). The main reason is that the detection efficiency of the local detector used in the latter scheme is low. However, in the case of long transmission distances (e.g. greater than 200 km), the key generation rate of scheme with WCS drops deeply, while the decline of the key generation rate of the present scheme is much flatter. As a result, the former can no longer generate keys after 211 km, while the latter can transmit a maximum distance of 228 km. Moreover, we also make a comparison between the present scheme and the GLLP protocol with HSPS. The simulation results show that the GLLP protocol with HSPS is very sensitive to the state preparation error and its key generation rate will rapidly decrease with the increase of the state preparation error. On the contrary, our present protocol shows almost no performance degradation under practical state preparation errors. It thus verify the robustness against the state preparation errors of our present work. In addition, in principle, the method can also be combined with the measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol and the twin-field quantum key distribution protocol to further increase the secure communication transmission distance that the present system can reach. Therefore, this work may provide an important reference value for the practical application of long-distance quantum secure communication in the near future.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, P IEEE INT C COMPUTE, DOI [10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025, DOI 10.1016/J.TCS.2014.05.025]
[2]   Limitations on practical quantum cryptography [J].
Brassard, G ;
Lütkenhaus, N ;
Mor, T ;
Sanders, BC .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 85 (06) :1330-1333
[3]   Spatial and spectral mode selection of heralded single photons from pulsed parametric down-donversion [J].
Castelletto, S ;
Degiovanni, IP ;
Schettini, V .
OPTICS EXPRESS, 2005, 13 (18) :6709-6722
[4]   Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution without Phase Postselection [J].
Cui, Chaohan ;
Yin, Zhen-Qiang ;
Wang, Rong ;
Chen, Wei ;
Wang, Shuang ;
Guo, Guang-Can ;
Han, Zheng-Fu .
PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED, 2019, 11 (03)
[5]   Two independent photon pairs versus four-photon entangled states in parametric down conversion [J].
De Riedmatten, H ;
Scarani, V ;
Marcikic, I ;
Acín, A ;
Tittel, W ;
Zbinden, H ;
Gisin, N .
JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2004, 51 (11) :1637-1649
[6]  
Gottesman D, 2004, QUANTUM INF COMPUT, V4, P325
[7]   Higher key rate of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution through joint data processing [J].
Jiang, Cong ;
Yu, Zong-Wen ;
Hu, Xiao-Long ;
Wang, Xiang-Bin .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2021, 103 (01)
[8]   Optimal focusing for maximal collection of entangled narrow-band photon pairs into single-mode fibers [J].
Ljunggren, D ;
Tengner, M .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2005, 72 (06)
[9]   Decoy state quantum key distribution [J].
Lo, HK ;
Ma, XF ;
Chen, K .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2005, 94 (23)
[10]   Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances [J].
Lo, HK ;
Chau, HF .
SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5410) :2050-2056