Simulation and evaluation of high-performance cost-effective positron emission mammography scanner

被引:1
作者
Musa, M. S. [1 ]
Ozsahin, D. Uzun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ozsahin, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Near East Blvd,Mersin 10 TRNC, TR-99138 Nicosia, Turkey
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Gordon Ctr Med Imaging, 125 Nashua St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, 125 Nashua St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION | 2018年 / 13卷
关键词
Gamma camera; SPECT; PET PET/CT; coronary CT angiography (CTA); X-ray mammography and scinto- and MRI-mammography;
D O I
10.1088/1748-0221/13/11/C11023
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the main cause of tumor deaths in women, thus several imaging modalities have been introduced recently to better diagnose the disease. New breast cancer cases were estimated to reach up to 246,660 in 2017, and the mortality rate was above 40,000. Early diagnosis is widely approved as being essential for an effective treatment and it also helps to reduce the incidences and mortality rates. Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) is a breastdedicated imaging device which uses a pair of annihilation gamma photons to detect abnormalities in the breast tissue. PEM device is compact in nature with a reduced field of view to cover the entire breast region, and it employs few detector modules which makes it cost-efficient. To effectively diagnose breast cancer at a very early stage, a device with high spatial resolution and high sensitivity is required. PEM detectors based on semiconductor materials are characterized by an excellent intrinsic spatial resolution but are not cost-effective, whereas detectors based on scintillator crystals are cost-effective but have limited intrinsic resolution to detect small breast lesions. This study focuses on improving the resolution of scintillator detectors by simulating a PEM scanner employing 1 x 1 x 10 mm(3) laser processed scintillator crystal. The simulation was done with a GEANT4 application for emission tomography (GATE) software, and performance evaluation tests were carried out according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) standards. The scanner geometry has 90 mm transaxial field of view (FOV) and 105 mm axial FOV. Evaluation results showed that the scanner has 10.6% system sensitivity, 1.0 mm spatial resolution at the center of the FOV (CFOV) and at 2.5 cm transaxial direction. The resolution at the axial 2.5 cm position is 2.1 mm. NEMA image quality test and Derenzo phantom study showed that the scanner can easily resolve 1 mm in diameter hot rods.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] The medipix3 prototype, a pixel readout chip working in single photon counting mode with improved spectrometric performance
    Ballabriga, R.
    Campbell, M.
    Heijne, E. H. M.
    Llopart, X.
    Tlustos, L.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2007, 54 (05) : 1824 - 1829
  • [2] Pixelated CdTe detectors to overcome intrinsic limitations of crystal based positron emission mammographs
    De Lorenzo, G.
    Chmeissani, M.
    Uzun, D.
    Kolstein, M.
    Ozsahin, I.
    Mikhaylova, E.
    Arce, P.
    Canadas, M.
    Arino, G.
    Calderon, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2013, 8
  • [3] Organ-Dedicated Molecular Imaging Systems
    Gonzalez, Antonio J.
    Sanchez, Filomeno
    Benlloch, Jose M.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 2 (05) : 388 - 403
  • [4] Review of functional/anatomical imaging in oncology
    Histed, Stephanie N.
    Lindenberg, Maria L.
    Mena, Esther
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Kurdziel, Karen A.
    [J]. NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 33 (04) : 349 - 361
  • [5] Nuclear imaging of the breast: Translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use
    Hruska, Carrie B.
    O'Connor, Michael K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (05)
  • [6] Monte Carlo simulation of PET/MR scanner and assessment of motion correction strategies
    Isin, A.
    Ozsahin, D. Uzun
    Dutta, J.
    Haddani, S.
    El-Fakhri, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2017, 12
  • [7] GATE:: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT
    Jan, S
    Santin, G
    Strul, D
    Staelens, S
    Assié, K
    Autret, D
    Avner, S
    Barbier, R
    Bardiès, M
    Bloomfield, PM
    Brasse, D
    Breton, V
    Bruyndonckx, P
    Buvat, I
    Chatziioannou, AF
    Choi, Y
    Chung, YH
    Comtat, C
    Donnarieix, D
    Ferrer, L
    Glick, SJ
    Groiselle, CJ
    Guez, D
    Honore, PF
    Kerhoas-Cavata, S
    Kirov, AS
    Kohli, V
    Koole, M
    Krieguer, M
    van der Laan, DJ
    Lamare, F
    Largeron, G
    Lartizien, C
    Lazaro, D
    Maas, MC
    Maigne, L
    Mayet, F
    Melot, F
    Merheb, C
    Pennacchio, E
    Perez, J
    Pietrzyk, U
    Rannou, FR
    Rey, M
    Schaart, DR
    Schmidtlein, CR
    Simon, L
    Song, TY
    Vieira, JM
    Visvikis, D
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (19) : 4543 - 4561
  • [8] Performance Evaluation and Initial Clinical Test of the Positron Emission Mammography System (PEMi)
    Li, Lin
    Gu, Xiao-Yue
    Li, Dao-Wu
    Huang, Xian-Chao
    Chai, Pei
    Feng, Bao-Tong
    Wang, Pei-Lin
    Yun, Ming-Kai
    Dai, Dong
    Zhang, Zhi-Ming
    Yin, Peng-Fei
    Xu, Wen-Gui
    Wei, Long
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2015, 62 (05) : 2048 - 2056
  • [9] Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer
    Luis Vercher-Conejero, Jose
    Pelegri-Martinez, Laura
    Lopez-Aznar, Diego
    del Puig Cozar-Santiago, Maria
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 5 (01): : 61 - 83
  • [10] Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET
    Moliner, L.
    Gonzalez, A. J.
    Soriano, A.
    Sanchez, F.
    Correcher, C.
    Orero, A.
    Caries, M.
    Vidal, L. F.
    Barbera, J.
    Caballero, L.
    Seimetz, M.
    Vazquez, C.
    Benlloch, J. M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (09) : 5393 - 5404