Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence

被引:118
作者
Jiang, Nan [1 ]
Wang, Bowei [1 ]
Chen, Anfu [1 ]
Dong, Fu [1 ]
Yu, Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PERCUTANEOUS SUTURE; WEIGHT-BEARING; COMPLICATION; HYPERTHERMIA; REPAIR; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-011-1431-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a meta-analysis, the clinical effectiveness of operative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) compared with nonoperative treatment. We systematically searched six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Clinical Ovid, BIOSIS and Cochrane registry of controlled clinical trials) to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which operative treatment was compared with nonoperative treatment for AATR from 1980 to 2011. Trial quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. The data was using fixed-effects and random-effects models with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Ten RCTs with a total of 894 patients were screened. The results showed that operative was superior to nonoperative treatment regarding lower risk of re-rupture (P = 0.002) and shorter time for sick leave (P = 0.009) but inferior to nonoperative treatment regarding complication risks (P = 0.004). No significant difference was identified between the two methods regarding the number of patients who successfully returned to pre-injury sports (P = 0.30). Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in relation to scar adhesion (P < 0.00001), superficial infection (P = 0.05), and sensibility disturbance (P = 0.0003). However, no significant differences were found between the two interventions in relation to deep infection (P = 0.22), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (P = 0.14), and extreme Achilles tendon lengthening (P = 0.31). Little consensus was obtained in the functional recovery from current trials as a result of an inconsistent assessment system. Compared with conservative treatment, operative treatment can effectively reduce the risk of re-rupture but increase the probability of complications. The increased complication risk may be associated with open repair surgery. However, no sufficient evidence is available from current studies to support the belief that operation may lead to better functional recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 773
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Achilles tendon problems: Not just an orthopaedic issue [J].
Ames, Paul Richard Julian ;
Longo, Umile Giuseppe ;
Denaro, Vincenzo ;
Maffulli, Nicola .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 30 (20-22) :1646-1650
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ORTHOPEDIC T
[3]  
[Anonymous], MUSCULOSKELET SURG
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN ORTHOP RELAT RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[6]  
ARNER O, 1959, Acta Chir Scand Suppl, V116, P1
[7]  
Bhandari M, 2002, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P190
[8]  
Birch HL, 1997, J EXP BIOL, V200, P1703
[9]   OPERATIVE VERSUS NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF ACHILLES-TENDON RUPTURE - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
CETTI, R ;
CHRISTENSEN, SE ;
EJSTED, R ;
JENSEN, NM ;
JORGENSEN, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (06) :791-799
[10]   Randomised controlled trials of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for rupture of the tendo Achillis [J].
Costa, ML ;
MacMillan, K ;
Halliday, D ;
Chester, R ;
Shepstone, L ;
Robinson, AHN ;
Donell, ST .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (01) :69-77