Factor market distortion correction, resource reallocation and potential productivity gains: An empirical study on China's heavy industry sector

被引:164
作者
Yang, Mian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Fuxia [4 ]
Sun, Chuanwang [5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Econ & Management Sch, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Econ Dev Res, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Populat Resource & Environm Econ Res, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, China Ctr Energy Econ Res, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
Factor market distortion; Resource misallocation; Total factor productivity; Price elasticity of factor demands; Heavy industry sector; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; MANUFACTURING TFP; PRICE DISTORTION; ENERGY-PRICE; MISALLOCATION; SUBSTITUTION; ALLOCATION; DEMAND; IMPACT; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, we develop a novel analysis framework for evaluating the effects of resource reallocation from the correction of factor market distortion (FMD) on total factor productivity (TFP) gains. We first measure FMD in China's heavy industry sector from 1995 to 2012, and then investigate the effects of resource reallocation from FMD correction by using the price elasticity of factor demands as a link, along with its potential TFP gains. The results indicate that: (1) Taking the price of capital as a reference, the prices of labour and energy in the study period were relatively higher to different extents. (2) If current FMD were fully corrected, the labour input in China's heavy industry sector would increase by 25.37%, whereas capital and energy inputs would decrease by 18.51% and 10.57%, respectively. (3) The resource reallocation effects resulting from current FMD correction will bring about significant TFP improvement (by 8.55%) in China's heavy industry sector, and there are evident industrial differences and stage characteristics for these promoting effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 279
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Adamopoulos T., 2015, Misallocation, Selection and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Micro-Data from China
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MICROECONOMICS
[3]   PARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY TESTS, ECONOMIES OF SCALE, AND INPUT DEMAND IN UNITED-STATES ELECTRIC-POWER GENERATION [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
HALVORSEN, R .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1984, 25 (03) :647-662
[4]   Why Does Misallocation Persist? [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit V. ;
Moll, Benjamin .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (01) :189-206
[5]   Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection [J].
Bartelsman, Eric ;
Haltiwanger, John ;
Scarpetta, Stefano .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :305-334
[6]   Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China [J].
Brandt, Loren ;
Tombe, Trevor ;
Zhu, Xiaodong .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 16 (01) :39-58
[7]   Regional disparity and economic growth in China - The impact of labor market distortions [J].
Cai, F ;
Wang, D ;
Du, Y .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 13 (2-3) :197-212
[8]  
Chen S., 2011, China Economic Quarterly, V10, P735, DOI [DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2011.03.012, 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2011.03.012]
[9]  
Chen Y., 2015, J WORLD EC, P29
[10]  
Chen Y., 2014, EC RES J, P18