Experimental compressive behavior of novel composite wall with different width-to-thickness ratios

被引:3
作者
Qin, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
Zhu, Xing -Yu [1 ]
Xi, Wang [1 ]
Chen, Yuan-Ze [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab Concrete & Prestressed Concrete Struct, Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
width-to-thickness ratio; double skin composite wall; truss connector; compressive behavior; BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES; AXIAL LOAD BEHAVIOR; PLATE SHEAR WALLS; STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOR; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; CONCRETE; PERFORMANCE; STRENGTH; CONNECTORS;
D O I
10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.187
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Double skin composite wall system owns several structural merits in terms of high load-carrying capacity, large axial stiffness, and favorable ductility. A recently proposed form of truss connector was used to bond the steel plates to the concrete core to achieve good composite action. The structural behavior of rectangular high walls under compression and T-shaped high walls under eccentric compression has been investigated by the authors. Furthermore, the influences of the truss spacings, the wall width, and the faceplate thickness have been previously studied by the authors on short walls under uniform compression. This paper experimentally investigated the effect of width-to-thickness ratio on the compressive behavior of short walls. Compressive tests were conducted on three short specimens with different width-to-thickness ratios. Based on the test results, it is found that the composite wall shows high compressive resistance and good ductility. The walls fail by local buckling of steel plates and crushing of concrete core. It is also observed that width-to-thickness ratio has great influence on the compressive resistance, initial stiffness, and strain distribution across the section. Finally, the test results are compared with the predictions by modern codes.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 199411 EN EUR STAND
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 159 CECS CHIN ASS EN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Code for design of concrete structures
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 22812010 GBT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 29752018 GBT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SPEC STRUCT STEEL BU
[7]   Performance evaluation of different types of steel moment resisting frames subjected to strong ground motion through incremental dynamic analysis [J].
Asgarian, Behrouz ;
Khazaee, Hamideh ;
Mirtaheri, Masoud .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2012, 12 (03) :363-379
[8]   Energy demands in reinforced concrete wall piers coupled by buckling restrained braces subjected to near-fault earthquake [J].
Beiraghi, Hamid .
STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2018, 27 (06) :703-716
[9]   Experimental Resistance and Available Ductility of Steel-Plate Composite Walls in One-Way Bending [J].
Bruhl, Jakob C. ;
Varma, Amit H. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (04)
[10]   Seismic behavior of double-skin composite wall with L-shaped and C-shaped connectors [J].
Chen, Lihua ;
Wang, Shiye ;
Lou, Yu ;
Xia, Dengrong .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2019, 160 :255-270