The Karen instruments for measuring quality of nursing care: construct validity and internal consistency

被引:19
作者
Lindgren, Margareta [1 ]
Andersson, Inger S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Nursing Sci, Dept Med & Hlth, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
quality of nursing care; the Karen instruments; instrument development; patients perspective; personnels perspective;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzq092
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Valid and reliable instruments for measuring the quality of care are needed for evaluation and improvement of nursing care. Previously developed and evaluated instruments, the Karen-patient and the Karen-personnel based on Donabedians StructureProcessOutcome triad (SPO triad) had promising content validity, discriminative power and internal consistency. The objective of this study was to further develop the instruments with regard to construct validity and internal consistency. This prospective study was carried out in medical and surgical wards at a hospital in Sweden. A total of 95 patients and 120 personnel were included. The instruments were tested for construct validity by performing factor analyses in two steps and for internal consistency using Cronbachs alpha coefficient. The first confirmatory factor analyses, with a pre-determined three-factor solution did not load well according to the SPO triad, but the second exploratory factor analysis with a six-factor solution appeared to be more coherent and the distribution of variables seemed to be logical. The reliability, i.e. internal consistency, was good in both factor analyses. The Karen-patient and the Karen-personnel instruments have achieved acceptable levels of construct validity. The internal consistency of the instruments is good. This indicates that the instruments may be suitable to use in clinical practice for measuring the quality of nursing care.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 301
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] ANDERSSON IS, 1995, MED DISSERTATIONS LI, V464
  • [2] ANDERSSON S, 2008, VARD NORDEN, V89, P14
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1994, Psychometric Theory
  • [4] Attree M, 2001, J Nurs Manag, V9, P67, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2001.00219.x
  • [5] Patients' and relatives' experiences and perspectives of 'Good' and 'Not so Good' quality care
    Attree, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 33 (04) : 456 - 466
  • [6] BAUMAN MK, 1995, HOLISTIC NURSING PRA
  • [7] Defining quality of care
    Campbell, SM
    Roland, MO
    Buetow, SA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (11) : 1611 - 1625
  • [8] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [9] THE QUALITY OF CARE - HOW CAN IT BE ASSESSED
    DONABEDIAN, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (12): : 1743 - 1748