MENTAL WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT USING A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA METHOD

被引:9
作者
Eraslan, Ergue [1 ]
Can, Guelin Feryal [1 ]
Atalay, Kumru Didem [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
来源
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE | 2016年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
fuzzy multi-criteria assessment; MCH; NASA-TLX; subjective mental workload; SWAT; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.17559/TV-20140401112509
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The workload factors for labor-intensive works of employees are always taken into account in measuring workloads. However, with the introduction of computers to work planning and coordination, the tasks have often begun to take on mental workload. Mental workload is encountered in academic studies in relatively high prevalence. In this regard, it is important to examine the efficiency of scientific studies to support the academic, administrative, and technical staff of a faculty. Many methods having certain disadvantages are available in the literature which is either conflicting or complementary to each other. Therefore, an integrated mental workload assessment method is needed. In this study, a new hierarchical method was proposed and by help of a scale developed, taking the subjective techniques (MCH, SWAT, NASA-TLX) into account, the faculty staff was holistically assessed in a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making processes. The subjects were selected in an engineering school at a private university. Four risk categories are defined that contain homogenous risk scores. At the end of the study, some ergonomic regulations are recommended to the persons/departments at high risk categories to reduce mental workloads.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 674
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Rapid assessment of integrated nuclear cogeneration projects using multi-criteria indices [J].
Bhattacharyya, Rupsha ;
Khalid, Farrukh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (12) :17647-17663
[42]   Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications [J].
Guo, Sen ;
Zhao, Haoran .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2017, 121 :23-31
[43]   Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection [J].
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Amiri, Maghsoud ;
Turskis, Zenonas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS COMMUNICATIONS & CONTROL, 2016, 11 (03) :358-371
[44]   The ELECTRE I Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets [J].
Chen, Na ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Xia, Meimei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (03) :621-657
[45]   Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on Fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method [J].
Mishra, Arunodaya Raj ;
Rani, Pratibha .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (05) :2469-2484
[46]   A new fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on proximity index value [J].
Mufazzal, Sameera ;
Khan, Noor Zaman ;
Muzakkir, S. M. ;
Siddiquee, Arshad Noor ;
Khan, Zahid .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2022, 39 (01) :42-58
[47]   Applying Fuzzy Probabilistic PROMETHEE on a Multi-Criteria Decision Problem [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Susmita ;
Mandal, Indraneel .
PROCEEDINGS OF SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2016), VOL 1, 2017, 546 :353-359
[48]   Decider: A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system [J].
Ma, Jun ;
Lu, Jie ;
Zhang, Guangquan .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (01) :23-31
[49]   A multi-criteria decision method for sustainability assessment of the use phase of machine tool systems [J].
Avram, Oliver ;
Stroud, Ian ;
Xirouchakis, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 53 (5-8) :811-828
[50]   Intuitive fuzzy multi-expert & multi-criteria decision making methodology: An application in healthcare industry [J].
Otay, Irem .
JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2022, 37 (02) :1047-1062