MENTAL WORKLOAD ASSESSMENT USING A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA METHOD

被引:9
作者
Eraslan, Ergue [1 ]
Can, Guelin Feryal [1 ]
Atalay, Kumru Didem [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ankara, Turkey
来源
TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE | 2016年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
fuzzy multi-criteria assessment; MCH; NASA-TLX; subjective mental workload; SWAT; SYSTEMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.17559/TV-20140401112509
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The workload factors for labor-intensive works of employees are always taken into account in measuring workloads. However, with the introduction of computers to work planning and coordination, the tasks have often begun to take on mental workload. Mental workload is encountered in academic studies in relatively high prevalence. In this regard, it is important to examine the efficiency of scientific studies to support the academic, administrative, and technical staff of a faculty. Many methods having certain disadvantages are available in the literature which is either conflicting or complementary to each other. Therefore, an integrated mental workload assessment method is needed. In this study, a new hierarchical method was proposed and by help of a scale developed, taking the subjective techniques (MCH, SWAT, NASA-TLX) into account, the faculty staff was holistically assessed in a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making processes. The subjects were selected in an engineering school at a private university. Four risk categories are defined that contain homogenous risk scores. At the end of the study, some ergonomic regulations are recommended to the persons/departments at high risk categories to reduce mental workloads.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 674
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP
    Rezaei, Jafar
    Ortt, Roland
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 225 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [22] Multi-criteria assessment of small scale CHP technologies in buildings
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Balezentis, Tomas
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 : 183 - 189
  • [23] Multi-Criteria Project Selection Using an Extended VIKOR Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets
    Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Sadaghiani, Jamshid Salehi
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (05) : 993 - 1016
  • [24] An outranking method for multi-criteria group decision making using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic term sets
    Faizi, Shahzad
    Rashid, Tabasam
    Zafar, Sohail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (03) : 2153 - 2164
  • [25] Multi-criteria decision making in Pythagorean fuzzy environment
    Fei, Liguo
    Deng, Yong
    [J]. APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 50 (02) : 537 - 561
  • [26] A New Approach to Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Acceptability Analysis
    Yatsalo, Boris
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FUZZY SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION AND THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 89 : 947 - 952
  • [27] Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools
    Buyukozkan, Gulcin
    Feyzioglu, Orhan
    Cifci, Gizem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2011, 4 (02) : 184 - 195
  • [28] A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method
    Boran, Fatih Emre
    Genc, Serkan
    Kurt, Mustafa
    Akay, Diyar
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (08) : 11363 - 11368
  • [29] Methodology for Natech coupling risk assessment using correlative multi-criteria decision-making method
    Wang, Jiajun
    Weng, Wenguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2023, 83
  • [30] Hesitant triangular fuzzy FlowSort method: the multi-criteria decision-making problems
    Gholizade, Masoume
    Rahmanimanesh, Mohammad
    Soltanizadeh, Hadi
    Sana, Shib Sankar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE-OPERATIONS & LOGISTICS, 2023, 10 (01)