THE NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING SCIENCE

被引:1
作者
Park, Jongwon [1 ]
Yoon, Hye-Gyoung [2 ]
Kim, Mijung [3 ]
Jho, Hunkoog [4 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Gwnagju 61186, South Korea
[2] Chnucheon Natl Univ Educ, Chunchon 24328, South Korea
[3] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G G25, Canada
[4] Dankook Univ, Gyounggido 16890, Yongin, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION | 2021年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
evidence evaluation; evidence-based reasoning; evidence-based response; idea-based response; scientific evidence; STUDENTS USE; ARGUMENTATION; FRAMEWORK; CREDIBILITY; QUALITY; IDEAS;
D O I
10.33225/jbse/21.20.840
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific evidence-based reasoning has been recognized as a form of reasoning that characterizes scientific thinking. This study questioned what scientific evidence means in the various types of scientific activities; that is, this study explored the nature of scientific evidence (NOSE). To do this, previous studies were examined to understand how scientific evidence was analyzed, evaluated, and utilized during the scientific activities of scientists or students in scientific or everyday situations. Through this process, seven statements were identified to describe the NOSE. This study explains these seven NOSE statements, constructs a process of scientific evidence-based reasoning as a structured form by reflecting these seven statements comprehensively, and discusses the practical implications for teaching science in schools. Finally, the limitations of this study are discussed, and possible directions for future studies are suggested. It is believed that the list of NOSE characteristics can provide a starting point for further elucidation and discussion of scientific evidence and helping students' science learning in more authentic ways.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 856
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching
    Sibel Erduran
    Liam Guilfoyle
    Wonyong Park
    Research in Science Education, 2022, 52 : 655 - 673
  • [32] Science and Religious Education Teachers' Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching
    Erduran, Sibel
    Guilfoyle, Liam
    Park, Wonyong
    RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2022, 52 (02) : 655 - 673
  • [33] Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: Examining the role of trust in science
    Rosman, Tom
    Groesser, Sianna
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2024, 33 (03) : 308 - 324
  • [34] The scientific revolution and its implications for long-run economic development
    Lehmann-Hasemeyer, Sibylle
    Prettner, Klaus
    Tscheuschner, Paul
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 168
  • [35] Argumentation research and its implications in science preservice teachers' training
    Antonio Archila, Pablo
    REVISTA EUREKA SOBRE ENSENANZA Y DIVULGACION DE LAS CIENCIAS, 2012, 9 (03): : 361 - +
  • [36] Nature of Technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms
    Waight, Noemi
    Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 34 (18) : 2875 - 2905
  • [37] Change in the nature of the university: the quality regime and its effects on the university teaching environment
    Buckley, F
    Hurley, J
    SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2001, 40 (04): : 545 - 576
  • [38] Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views and practice
    Sampson, Victor
    Blanchard, Margaret R.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2012, 49 (09) : 1122 - 1148
  • [39] The Effects of Constructivist Science Teaching Program on Scientific Processing Skills of 6 year-old Children
    Buyuktaskapu, Sema
    Celikoz, Nadir
    Akman, Berrin
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2012, 37 (165): : 275 - 292
  • [40] Comprehensive carbon footprint of Earth, environmental and space science laboratories: Implications for sustainable scientific practice
    Marc, Odin
    Barret, Maialen
    Biancamaria, Sylvain
    Dassas, Karin
    Firmin, Antoine
    Gandois, Laure
    Gheusi, Francois
    Kuppel, Sylvain
    Maisonobe, Marion
    Mialon, Arnaud
    Monnier, Lois
    Pantillon, Florian
    Toublanc, Florence
    PLOS SUSTAINABILITY AND TRANSFORMATION, 2024, 3 (10):