Embolisation of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations using high-frequency jet ventilation: benefits of minimising respiratory motion

Background To evaluate patient radiation dose and procedural duration recorded during pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVM) embolisation performed using high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) as compared with conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) Methods Patients undergoing PAVM embolisation with HFJV assistance after April 2017 were retrospectively identified as group A, and those treated with IPPV before April 2017 as group B. Primary outcomes were patient radiation dose and procedural duration between groups A and B. Secondary outcomes were difference in diaphragmatic excursion between groups A and B, in group A with/without HFJ assistance, technical/clinical success, and complications. Results Twelve PAVMs were embolised in 5 patients from group A, and 15 PAVMs in 10 patients from group B. Mean patient radiation was significantly lower in group A than in group B (54,307 +/- 33,823 mGy cm(2) [mean +/- standard deviation] versus 100,704 +/- 43,930 mGy cm(2); p = 0.022). Procedural duration was 33.4 +/- 16.1 min in group A versus 57.4 +/- 14.9 min in group B (p = 0.062). Diaphragmatic excursion was significantly lower in group A (1.3 +/- 0.4 mm) than in group B (19.7 +/- 5.2 mm; p < 0.001) and lower with near statistical significance in group A with HFJV than without HFJV (1.3 +/- 0.4 mm versus 10.9 +/- 3.1 mm; p = 0.062). Technical and clinical success was 100% in both groups, without relevant complications. Conclusion HFJV-assisted PAVM embolisation is a safe, feasible technique resulting in reduced patient radiation doses and procedural time.