How Decision Reversibility Affects Motivation

被引:7
作者
Bullens, Lottie [1 ]
van Harreveld, Frenk [1 ]
Forster, Jens [1 ]
Higgins, E. Tory [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Social Psychol, NL-1018 XA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
decision reversibility; regulatory focus; motivation; processing style; AVOIDANCE MOTOR ACTIONS; REGULATORY FOCUS; SELF-REGULATION; COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING; GOAL ATTAINMENT; PREVENTION; FIT; PROMOTION; ALTERNATIVES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0033581
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present research examined how decision reversibility can affect motivation. On the basis of extant findings, it was suggested that 1 way it could affect motivation would be to strengthen different regulatory foci, with reversible decision making, compared to irreversible decision making, strengthening prevention-related motivation relatively more than promotion-related motivation. If so, then decision reversibility should have effects associated with the relative differences between prevention and promotion motivation. In 5 studies, we manipulated the reversibility of a decision and used different indicators of regulatory focus motivation to test these predictions. Specifically, Study 1 tested for differences in participants' preference for approach versus avoidance strategies toward a desired end state. In Study 2, we used speed and accuracy performance as indicators of participants' regulatory motivation, and in Study 3, we measured global versus local reaction time performance. In Study 4, we approached the research question in a different way, making use of the value-from-fit hypothesis (Higgins, 2000, 2002). We tested whether a fit between chronic regulatory focus and focus induced by the reversibility of the decision increased participants' subjective positive feelings about the decision outcome. Finally, in Study 5, we tested whether regulatory motivation, induced by decision reversibility, also influenced participants' preference in specific product features. The results generally support our hypothesis showing that, compared to irreversible decisions, reversible decisions strengthen a prevention focus more than a promotion focus. Implications for research on decision making are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 849
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[31]   Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes [J].
Gilbert, DT ;
Ebert, JEJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (04) :503-514
[32]   Regulatory fit effects on stimulus identification [J].
Glass, Brian D. ;
Maddox, W. Todd ;
Markman, Arthur B. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (03) :927-937
[33]  
Gollwitzer P. M., 1990, HDB MOTIVATION COGNI, V2, P53
[34]  
Gollwitzer P. M., 1993, European Review of Social Psychology, V4, P141, DOI DOI 10.1080/14792779343000059
[35]   Spoilt for choice: The role of counterfactual thinking in the excess choice and reversibility paradoxes [J].
Hafner, Rebecca J. ;
White, Mathew P. ;
Handley, Simon J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 48 (01) :28-36
[36]   Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes [J].
Harmon-Jones, E ;
Harmon-Jones, C .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (06) :711-723
[37]   Making a good decision: Value from fit [J].
Higgins, ET .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (11) :1217-1230
[38]   Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator [J].
Higgins, ET ;
Shah, J ;
Friedman, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 72 (03) :515-525
[39]   IDEAL VERSUS OUGHT PREDILECTIONS FOR APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE - DISTINCT SELF-REGULATORY SYSTEMS [J].
HIGGINS, ET ;
RONEY, CJR ;
CROWE, E ;
HYMES, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (02) :276-286
[40]   Beyond pleasure and pain [J].
Higgins, ET .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1997, 52 (12) :1280-1300