The biology of seed discrimination and its role in shaping the foraging ecology of carabids: A review

被引:9
作者
Ali, Khaldoun A. [1 ]
Willenborg, Christian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Agr & Bioresources, Plant Sci Dept, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Carabid (ground) beetles; foraging; postdispersal seed predation; seed bank; weed biocontrol; weed seeds; GROUND-BEETLES COLEOPTERA; FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT PREDATION; LIMITATION PROMOTE OMNIVORY; ANTENNAL TASTE SENSILLA; WEED SEEDS; POSTDISPERSAL PREDATION; ABUTILON-THEOPHRASTI; PREY DETECTION; BITE FORCE; FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.7898
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Species of carabid (ground) beetles are among the most important postdispersal weed seed predators in temperate arable lands. Field studies have shown that carabid beetles can remove upwards of 65%-90% of specific weed seeds shed in arable fields each year. Such data do not explain how and why carabid predators go after weed seeds, however. It remains to be proven that weed seed predation by carabids is a genuine ecological interaction driven by certain ecological factors or functional traits that determine interaction strength and power predation dynamics, bringing about therefore a natural regulation of weed populations. Along these lines, this review ties together the lines of evidence around weed seed predation by carabid predators. Chemoperception rather than vision seems to be the primary sensory mechanism guiding seed detection and seed selection decisions in carabid weed seed predators. Selection of weed seeds by carabid seed predators appears directed rather than random. Yet, the nature of the chemical cues mediating detection of different seed species and identification of the suitable seed type among them remains unknown. Selection of certain types of weed seeds cannot be predicted based on seed chemistry per se in all cases, however. Rather, seed selection decisions are ruled by sophisticated behavioral mechanisms comprising the assessment of both chemical and physical characteristics of the seed. The ultimate selection of certain weed seed types is determined by how the chemical and physical properties of the seed match with the functional traits of the predator in terms of seed handling ability. Seed density, in addition to chemical and physical seed traits, is also an important factor that is likely to shape seed selection decisions in carabid weed seed predators. Carabid responses to seed density are rather complex as they are influenced not only by seed numbers but also by trait-based suitability ranks of the different seed types available in the environment.
引用
收藏
页码:13702 / 13722
页数:21
相关论文
共 256 条
[1]   Understanding insect foraging in complex habitats by comparing trophic levels: insights from specialist host-parasitoid-hyperparasitoid systems [J].
Aartsma, Yavanna ;
Cusumano, Antonino ;
de Bobadilla, Maite Fernandez ;
Rusman, Quint ;
Vosteen, Ilka ;
Poelman, Erik H. .
CURRENT OPINION IN INSECT SCIENCE, 2019, 32 :54-60
[2]   The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence [J].
Abrams, PA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 :79-105
[3]   Macroevolution of plant defense strategies [J].
Agrawal, Anurag A. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (02) :103-109
[4]  
Agrawal AA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, pS132, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Seed traits in arable weed seed banks and their relationship to land-use changes [J].
Albrecht, Harald ;
Auerswald, Karl .
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 10 (06) :516-524
[7]   Prey-predator size-dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world [J].
Aljetlawi, AA ;
Sparrevik, E ;
Leonardsson, K .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (02) :239-252
[8]   FACETS OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY IN INSECT-PLANT INTERACTIONS - AN OVERVIEW [J].
ANANTHAKRISHNAN, TN .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INDIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1990, 99 (03) :177-183
[9]   INSECT SEED PREDATORS MAY CAUSE FAR GREATER LOSSES THAN THEY APPEAR TO [J].
ANDERSEN, AN .
OIKOS, 1988, 52 (03) :337-340
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ECOLOGY ENV