Characterization of seismic hazard and structural response by energy flux

被引:6
作者
Safak, E [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Denver, CO 80225 USA
关键词
energy flux; seismic hazard; earthquakes; ground motion; structural response;
D O I
10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00036-1
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Seismic safety of structures depends on the structure's ability to absorb the seismic energy that is transmitted from ground to structure. One parameter that can be used to characterize seismic energy is the energy flax. Energy flux is defined as the amount of energy transmitted per unit time through a cross-section of a medium, and is equal to kinetic energy multiplied by the propagation velocity of seismic waves. The peak or the integral of energy flux can be used to characterize ground motions. By definition, energy flux automatically accounts for site amplification. Energy flux in a structure can be studied by formulating the problem as a wave propagation problem. For buildings founded on layered soil media and subjected to vertically incident plane shear waves, energy Aux equations are derived by modeling the building as an extension of the layered soil medium, and considering each story as another layer. The propagation of energy flux in the layers is described in terms of the upgoing and downgoing energy flux in each layer, and the energy reflection and transmission coefficients at each interface. The formulation results in a pair of simple finite-difference equations for each layer, which can be solved recursively starting from the bedrock. The upgoing and downgoing energy flux in the layers allows calculation of the energy demand and energy dissipation in each layer. The methodology is applicable to linear, as well as nonlinear structures. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 43
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic Hazard and Structural Analysis of the Concrete Arch Dam (Rules Dam on Guadalfeo River)
    Zacchei, Enrico
    Molina, Jose Luis
    Brasil, Reyolando M. L. R. F.
    X INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (EURODYN 2017), 2017, 199 : 1332 - 1337
  • [22] Seismic hazard assessment of Afghanistan
    Waseem, Muhammad
    Lateef, Abdul
    Ahmad, Irshad
    Khan, Sarfraz
    Ahmed, Waqas
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 217 - 242
  • [23] Advanced Seismic Hazard Assessment
    G. F. Panza
    K. Irikura
    M. Kouteva
    A. Peresan
    Z. Wang
    R. Saragoni
    Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2011, 168 : 1 - 9
  • [24] Seismic hazard and risk in Bhutan
    Victoria L. Stevens
    Raffaele De Risi
    Romain Le Roux-Mallouf
    Dowchu Drukpa
    György Hetényi
    Natural Hazards, 2020, 104 : 2339 - 2367
  • [25] Delineation and characterization of a new seismic source model for seismic hazard studies in Egypt
    R. Sawires
    J. A. Peláez
    H. A. Ibrahim
    R. E. Fat-Helbary
    J. Henares
    M. Hamdache
    Natural Hazards, 2016, 80 : 1823 - 1864
  • [26] Seismic Hazard of Hong Kong
    Pappin, J. W.
    Koo, R. C. H.
    Free, M. W.
    Tsang, H. H.
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 8 : 42 - 56
  • [27] Current seismic quiescence in Greece: Implications for seismic hazard
    Chouliaras, G
    Stavrakakis, GN
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2001, 5 (04) : 595 - +
  • [28] Influence of time-dependent seismic hazard on structural design
    Dall'Asta, Andrea
    Dabiri, Hamed
    Tondi, Emanuele
    Morci, Michele
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (06) : 2505 - 2529
  • [29] Current seismic quiescence in Greece: Implications for seismic hazard
    G. Chouliaras
    G.N. Stavrakakis
    Journal of Seismology, 2001, 5 : 595 - 608
  • [30] Soil characterization and seismic hazard maps for the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy)
    Slejko, D.
    Carulli, G. B.
    Riuscetti, M.
    Cucchi, F.
    Grimaz, S.
    Rebez, A.
    Accaino, F.
    Affatato, A.
    Biolchi, S.
    Nieto, D.
    Puntel, E.
    Sano, T.
    Santulin, M.
    Tinivella, U.
    Zini, L.
    BOLLETTINO DI GEOFISICA TEORICA ED APPLICATA, 2011, 52 (01) : 59 - 104