Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders

被引:155
作者
Falagario, Marco [1 ]
Sciancalepore, Fabio [1 ]
Costantino, Nicola [1 ]
Pietroforte, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Ingn Meccan & Gest, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
关键词
Auctions/bidding; Data envelopment analysis; Supplier selection; Decision analysis; Multiple criteria analysis; SUPPLIER SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; UTILITY; SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; CONTRACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.031
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The paper addresses the topic of supplier selection in public procurement. According to European directives, when tenders are awarded through the Most Economically Advantageous Tender" (MEAT) criterion, the awarding committee has to decide the tender evaluation criteria of the presented bids in advance. The authors propose a decision making tool that is aimed at helping the awarding committee in this difficult task and, at the same time, maintaining a transparent procedure in accordance with governmental procurement regulations and requirements as well as guaranteeing fair and equal evaluation of all bids. In this regard, the decision problem of supplier selection is addressed by applying an extension of the DEA (data envelopment analysis) methodology. The cross-efficiency evaluation is used for selecting the best supplier among the eligible candidates. The proposed technique allows the evaluation of quantitative data related to vendor selection and keeps the transparency features requested by public procurement. In addition, all bids are equally assessed according to the same objectively defined weights without any subjective setting by the public officers. The effectiveness and efficiency of the approach is supported by a case study that pertains to the tender of an Italian public agency. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 529
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context
    Adler, N
    Friedman, L
    Sinuany-Stern, Z
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (02) : 249 - 265
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, MEASURING EFFICIENCY
  • [3] Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure
    Araz, Ceyhun
    Ozkarahan, Irem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2007, 106 (02) : 585 - 606
  • [4] Baily P., 2005, Purchasing principles and management, V9th
  • [5] Bana e Costa C.A., 2007, OPERATIONAL RES WORK
  • [6] Bana eCosta., 1994, INT T OPER RES, V1, P489, DOI DOI 10.1016/0969-6016(94)90010-8
  • [7] COMPARISON OF WEIGHTING JUDGMENTS IN MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT
    BORCHERDING, K
    EPPEL, T
    VONWINTERFELDT, D
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (12) : 1603 - 1619
  • [8] Braglia M., 2000, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V30, P96, DOI [10.1108/09600030010318829, DOI 10.1108/09600030010318829]
  • [9] Bruno G., 2009, P IPSERA 2009 C WIES
  • [10] Callender G, 2005, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V11, P209